Re: gcj/java status

On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 01:18:35AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Please consider moving the following packages to testing: > gcj-4.1 I'm wondering whether the build-dependencies of gcj-4.1 are really accurate. Is it really the case that gcj-4.1 will build against any version of gcc-4.1-so

Bug#395162: Log for failed build of yate_1.0.0-1.dfsg-2 (dist=unstable3)

> Automatic build of yate_1.0.0-1.dfsg-2 on coconut0 by sbuild/ia64 0.49 ... > g++ -Wall -I.. -I.. -O2 -fno-check-new -fno-exceptions -fPIC > -DHAVE_GCC_FORMAT_CHECK -export-dynamic -shared > -Wl,--unresolved-symbols=ignore-in-shared-libs > -Wl,--retain-symbols-file,/dev/null -L.. -lyate -o

Processed: forwarded

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 395162 + upstream Bug#395162: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:558 There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 395162 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29585 Bug#395162: ICE: tree check: expecte

Bug#395162: Log for failed build of openvrml_0.15.10-8 (dist=unstable1)

> Automatic build of openvrml_0.15.10-8 on coconut0 by sbuild/ia64 0.49 ... > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../lib/antlr -I../../java > -I../../src/libopenvrml -DOPENVRML_LIBDIR_=\"/usr/lib\" > -DOPENVRML_PKGDATADIR_=\"/usr/share/openvrml\" -I/usr/include/freetype2 > -DXP_UNIX -I/usr

Welcome to Al-Manahel Newsletter List

The subscription of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Thanks for subscribing! Date of this subscription: Tue Oct 31 14:34:18 2006 Please save this email message for future reference. -

Re: gcc-4.1 status in unstable

Hi Matthias, On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 02:20:39PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > gcc-4.1 4.1.1-19 in unstable now looks like not showing build time > regressions compared to 4.1.1-13 in testing, validated on amd64. > Lucas Nussbaum volunteered to build testing from 2006-10-24 with -13 > and -17, the