--- Comment #2 from audriusa at bluewin dot ch 2006-10-23 19:33 ---
I confirm the correct work of our current CVS version. The bug is no longer
reproducible.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29547
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the b
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-23 19:16 ---
A regression hunt using the testcase from comment #2 with -O2 using an
alpha-linux cross compiler identified this patch which fixed the ICE on
mainline:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=110556
r110556
I understand you provide degree's.
Please provide more information.
S Mason
Matthias Klose writes:
>
> - arm: debian only port, not yet submitted to upstream; runtime is
>currently non-functional, testsuite shows failures for all
>interpreter test cases.
>#388505: segfaults in gcj-dbtool-4.1, not addressed.
>
> Going back to gcj-4.0 for arm could be a
[didn't see this email reaching the lists, sending it again]
Please consider moving the following packages to testing:
gcj-4.1
java-gcj-compat
gcc-defaults
ecj-bootstrap
gjdoc
The packages don't show regressions compared to the versions currently
in testin
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20061022-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20061022-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20061022-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20061022-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20061022-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20061022-1_amd64.deb
gcc-snapsh
gcc-snapshot_20061022-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20061022-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20061022.orig.tar.gz
gcc-snapshot_20061022-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20061022-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
7 matches
Mail list logo