Matthias Klose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> would it be possible for you to have a look at avifile to work around
> #392559 by changing the avifile code?
Done. If we add "template" as suggested, the compiler just gets more
confused. But these member templates don't need to be doubly templated;
they are onl
The subscription of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set. Thanks for subscribing!
Date of this subscription: Sat Oct 21 16:41:18 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
-
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2006-01-20 00:56:08 |2006-10-21 21:32:46
date||
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_3_4_6_release revision 111785
Native configuration is hppa-linux-gnu (bld-3)
=== gpc tests ===
Running target any
FAIL: avo2a.pas
FAIL: avo2b.pas
=== gpc Summary ===
# of tests5057
# of expected passes
FYI: The status of the gnat-4.1 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4.1.1-15
Current version: 4.1.1-16
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Accepted:
gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-17_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-17_hppa.deb
gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-17_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-17_i386.deb
gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-17_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-17_pow
gcj-4.1_4.1.1-17_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libgcj7-awt_4.1.1-17_powerpc.deb
libgcj7-awt_4.1.1-17_i386.deb
gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-17_i386.deb
gcj-4.1_4.1.1-17.diff.gz
gij-4.1_4.1.1-17_powerpc.deb
gcj-4.1_4.1.1-17_hppa.deb
libgcj7-dev_4.1.1-
Your message dated Sat, 21 Oct 2006 06:19:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393071: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds2-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 21 Oct 2006 06:19:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393010: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds2-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 21 Oct 2006 06:19:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392974: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds2-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 21 Oct 2006 06:19:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377613: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds2-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 21 Oct 2006 06:19:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394034: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds2-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 21 Oct 2006 06:19:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391445: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds2-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 21 Oct 2006 06:19:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392327: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds2-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 21 Oct 2006 06:19:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390620: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds2-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Accepted:
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-17_amd64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.1-17_amd64.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-17_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.1-17_hppa.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-17_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.1-17_i386.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-17_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/c
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.1-17_amd64.deb: package says section is libs, override says
devel.
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.1-17_hppa.deb: package says section is libs, override says
devel.
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.1-1
gcc-4.1_4.1.1ds2-17_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lib64ffi4_4.1.1-17_powerpc.deb
gobjc-4.1_4.1.1-17_powerpc.deb
gfortran-4.1_4.1.1-17_amd64.deb
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.1-17_i386.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-17_powerpc.deb
libgfortran1_4.1.1-17_i386.deb
fixinclud
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 312367 gcc-4.0: D support (gdc)
Bug#312367: gcc-3.3: D support
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 317983 gcc-4.0
Bug#317983: RFP: gdc -- D Front End for GCC
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `gcc-4.0'.
> merge 312367 317983
Bug#312367: gcc-4.0:
retitle 312367 gcc-4.0: D support (gdc)
reassign 317983 gcc-4.0
merge 312367 317983
thanks
GDC upstream moved to SourceForge:
http://dgcc.sourceforge.net/
Seo Sanghyeon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 matches
Mail list logo
