[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

-- fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot |

[Bug target/29472] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] in reload, at reload1.c:1081 on m68k with -O2 -fPIC

-- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debian-gcc at lists dot ||debian

Status of gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-16

Matthias Klose asked me to test gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-16 (4.1.2 20061007) to see whether it can be used instead of gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-13 (4.1.2 20060901) currently in testing. I found the following three regressions, two of which are issues where code is rejected that 4.1.1ds1-13 accepted: - PR c++/29

Bug#392974: marked as done (gcc-4.1: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:25:52 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392974: gcc-4.1: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Processed: Re: Processed: fwded

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 393071 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29469 Bug#393071: segmentation fault, related to sizeof Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29469. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Bug#391445: GCC 4.1 BUG - Cross compiling

On 10/15/06, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 999_lib64_for_cross.dpatch is still available in #231707 logs. I've not yet tested if it applies to current binutils package, and if this will fix #391445, but I'm almost sure the problem is here. Yes, it helps, just tested with bin

Bug#392054: ginac: FTBFS on arm

* Richard B. Kreckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-14 22:14]: > Setting CXXFLAGS to -O instead of -O2 at least makde the package > compile. (I don't suppose that g++-4.1_4.1.1-16 made a difference.) It compiles fine on my ARM box with -O2, using 4.1.1-13+b1 and 4.1.1-16. I suspect a temporary pro

[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-10-14 18:26 --- Subject: Re: [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 18:25 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > --- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 1

[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||9634 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 --- You

[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 18:25 --- DR 224 says this is invalid code but GDR has mentioned that DR 224 is broken in really bad way: template struct B : T { void g(void) { B x; x.f(); } } struct A { void f(void) {} } int main(void) { B t; t.

[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 18:15 --- I think this is more complicated than just DR 224. See PR 9634. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or a

[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 18:11 --- (In reply to comment #2) > The real question is avm_map dependent inside the nested class? > I know there are C++ defect reports asking that question so ... And that is DR 224 which is in WP. -- http://gcc.gnu.o

[Bug c++/29469] [DR 224] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|error: non-template 'pair' |[DR 224] error: non-template |used as template

Processed: fwded

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forward 393071 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29469 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > tags 393071 + upstream Bug#393071: segmentation fault, related to sizeof There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > -- Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#392974: gcc-4.1: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation

* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061014 07:02]: > Aurelien Jarno writes: > > The package (at least the source) contains GFDL docs with invariant > > sections and/or cover texts. > > please don't file reports for issues that you didn't investigate. Hm, Matthias, does that mean that you don't

Bug#392054: ginac: FTBFS on arm

* Richard B. Kreckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-14 22:14]: > Setting CXXFLAGS to -O instead of -O2 at least makde the package > compile. (I don't suppose that g++-4.1_4.1.1-16 made a difference.) This is not necesarily a compiler error. GCC might just be running out of memory or something. An

Bug#392974: gcc-4.1: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation

On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 04:02:10PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Aurelien Jarno writes: > > The package (at least the source) contains GFDL docs with invariant > > sections and/or cover texts. > please don't file reports for issues that you didn't investigate. Does that mean the bug should be cl

[Bug c++/29469] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 17:48 --- The real question is avm_map dependent inside the nested class? I know there are C++ defect reports asking that question so ... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 --- You are receiving thi

[Bug c++/29469] error: non-template 'pair' used as template

--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-14 17:37 --- Created an attachment (id=12429) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12429&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29469 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Bug c++/29469] New: error: non-template 'pair' used as template

The following example code compiled fine with 4.1.2 20060901 (Debian 4.1.1-13) but fails with 4.1.2 20061007 (Debian 4.1.1-16). I'm wondering whether this change was intentional and whether there's a good reason for this change (in a stable branch). $ g++-4.1 -c pair.c x.c:32: error: non-template

Bug#385327: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393

* Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-01 14:23]: > > > Please recheck with gcc-4.1.1-14 > > > > Isn't this PR28181 (still open)? Or did Roman not close PR tickets? > > This is still open as indicated by the failed builds of yacas and vtk. Yes, that's what I was trying to say, i.e. th

Bug#390879: [m68k] ICE in reload at reload1.c:1079

forwarded 390879 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29472 tags 390879 + forwarded thanks * Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-03 07:55]: > blender fails to build from source on m68k due to an ICE. Forwarded, thanks. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Bug#391445: GCC 4.1 BUG - Cross compiling

> Hello Nikita, > > I write you this mail, because, you did all the work to patch binutils > and gcc older versions. I have been trying to solve Debian bug 391445, > but i haven't been able to do it. Maybe you could tell me what would be > a good way to solve it, or maybe it is just a line in the

Bug#392054: ginac: FTBFS on arm

Setting CXXFLAGS to -O instead of -O2 at least makde the package compile. (I don't suppose that g++-4.1_4.1.1-16 made a difference.) See -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

[Bug debug/26881] [4.1 Regression] internal compiler error in dwarf2out_finish

--- Comment #20 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-14 16:48 --- Jan, do you intend to apply this to 4.1? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26881 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -

Processed: Re: compiler

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 392559 gcc-4.1 Bug#392559: avifile: FTBFS: error: non-template 'pair' used as template Bug reassigned from package `avifile' to `gcc-4.1'. > forwarded 392559 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29469 Bug#392559: avifile: FTBFS: error: non-template 'pair' use

Bug#393071: segmentation fault, related to sizeof

Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.1ds1-16 This is a regression from 4.1.1ds1-13. This is PR29469 > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../lib -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 > -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 > -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/gtk-1.

[Bug java/1427] gcc should allow gcj and gfortran to generate N_MAIN stab or DW_AT_entry_point dwarf2 debug info

-- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gcj should generate N_MAIN |gcc should allow gcj and |stab or DW_AT_entry_point

[Bug java/1427] gcj should generate N_MAIN stab or DW_AT_entry_point dwarf2 debug info

--- Comment #19 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 14:17 --- Someone should make gdb understand the DW_AT_calling_convention attribute. This is the bit necessary to make it work for Fortran. I considered stealing a bit on FUNCTION_DECL to mark it as the main program but it s

Processed: Re: gcc: Wrong code for hoisted multiplication

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 380541 + patch Bug#380541: gcc: Wrong code for hoisted multiplication There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#380541: gcc: Wrong code for hoisted multiplication

tags 380541 + patch thanks Andrew Pinski (pinskia) posted a patch on the upstream bugzilla: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28545#c14 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12428&action=view and we believe it's applicable to the Debian package: 17:19 < Womble2> pinskia: Don't

Processed: still there

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 393010 Bug#393010: rejects templates in destructors Bug reopened, originator not changed. > found 393010 4.1.1ds1-16 Bug#393010: rejects templates in destructors Bug marked as found in version 4.1.1ds1-16. > -- Stopping processing here. Please

Processed: gcc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 392172 -1 Bug#392172: FTBFS: JTree.h:118: error: parse error in template argument list Bug 392172 cloned as bug 393010. > reassign -1 gcc-4.1 Bug#393010: FTBFS: JTree.h:118: error: parse error in template argument list Bug reassigned from package

[Bug c/29468] off-by-one error for string initialiser warning

--- Comment #1 from neil at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 12:25 --- Not a bug - just 2 elements are initialized, the NUL is dropped. -- neil at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

Bug#392880: marked as done ([PR29468] off-by-one error for string initialiser warnings)

Your message dated Sat, 14 Oct 2006 15:13:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#392880: gcc-4.1: off-by-one error for string initialiser warnings has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#392880: gcc-4.1: off-by-one error for string initialiser warnings

Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > char string3[2] = "12"; > char d[]="d"; > char string4[2] = "123"; > char e[]="e"; > Here 'string3' and 'string4' are unterminated, as can be seen from the > program output at the end. But only the initialiser for 'string4' > gives a warn

Bug#392974: gcc-4.1: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation

Aurelien Jarno writes: > The package (at least the source) contains GFDL docs with invariant > sections and/or cover texts. please don't file reports for issues that you didn't investigate. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR

Bug#392974: gcc-4.1: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] package contains non-free documentation

Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-16 Severity: serious The package (at least the source) contains GFDL docs with invariant sections and/or cover texts. [bode:/tmp]$ apt-get source gcc-4.1 Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances... Fait Nécessité de prendre 44,0

Bug#392880: gcc-4.1: off-by-one error for string initialiser warnings

Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > one very useful feature of gcc is, that it warns you when you > produce unterminated strings by using too long initialisers. > Unfortunately the warning only kicks in, if the initialiser is at > least two bytes longer than the string buffer. This is delib

Processed: Re: Bug#392880: gcc-4.1: off-by-one error for string initialiser warnings

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 392880 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29468 Bug#392880: gcc-4.1: off-by-one error for string initialiser warnings Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29468. > tags 392880 + upstream Bug#392880: gcc-4.1: off-by-one e