Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)

2006-10-12 Thread Andreas Barth
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061013 06:43]: > Even if the kernel cannot be built with 4.1, it would be nice to have > bug reports. I'm not aware of any alpha related reports, although it's > not my pet arch. Of course. > I'm still planning not to build g++-4.0 from the 4.0 sources, now t

Re: Serious issues with linux-2.6 (was: Re: Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.18-3)

2006-10-12 Thread Matthias Klose
Steve Langasek writes: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:58:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061012 12:41]: > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > > > Two big issues are still open: > > > > - hppa FTBFS > > > > - alpha gcc-4.

[Bug c++/29408] [4.1/4.2 regression] parse error for valid code

2006-10-12 Thread us15 at os dot inf dot tu-dresden dot de
-- us15 at os dot inf dot tu-dresden dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||us15 at os dot inf dot tu- |

Re: hello,what is the gcc problem? etch gcc 4.1 no stdio.h?

2006-10-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 05:58 -0400, lantian ai wrote: > grandi:~# cat hello.c > #include > int main() > { > printf("hello world\n"); > } > grandi:~# gcc -o hello hello.c > hello.c:1:19: error: stdio.h: No such file or directory > hello.c: In function 'main': > hello.c:4: warning: incompa

Bug#389075: marked as done (invariant sections removed from the man pages)

2006-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:26:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#389075: fixed in gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg 4.1.1.nf3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#389076: marked as done (documentation incomplete / wrong)

2006-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:26:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#389076: fixed in gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg 4.1.1.nf3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg_4.1.1.nf3-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-10-12 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-4.1-doc_4.1.1.nf3-1_all.deb to pool/non-free/g/gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg/cpp-4.1-doc_4.1.1.nf3-1_all.deb gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg_4.1.1.nf3-1.diff.gz to pool/non-free/g/gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg/gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg_4.1.1.nf3-1.diff.gz gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg_4.1.1.nf3-1.dsc to pool/non-free/g

Bug#181096: other gadgets

2006-10-12 Thread Hardware Internet
Bitrates etc also supports recording available source a such is streaming online a cassettes lps via linein course saved into. Ram Registry hard drives am external storage devices known tracking easily clean? Variants targets branches accounts performs smart a checks is detect in created spee

hello,what is the gcc problem? etch gcc 4.1 no stdio.h?

2006-10-12 Thread lantian ai
grandi:~# cat hello.c #include int main() { printf("hello world\n"); } grandi:~# gcc -o hello hello.c hello.c:1:19: error: stdio.h: No such file or directory hello.c: In function 'main': hello.c:4: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'printf' grandi:~# ls /usr/

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

2006-10-12 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #391657 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27891 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 391657 + status-NEW #

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

2006-10-12 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #354439 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26560 # * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED -> NEW usertags 354439 - statu

[Bug c++/29435] [4.1/4.2 Regression] segmentation fault

2006-10-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug c++/29408] [4.1/4.2 regression] parse error for valid code

2006-10-12 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org
--- Comment #8 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-10-12 04:27 --- I don't believe the code is valid. W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29408 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCR

[Bug c++/29408] [4.1/4.2 regression] parse error for valid code

2006-10-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug c++/29408] [4.1/4.2 regression] parse error for valid code

2006-10-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29408 --- You

[Bug c++/29435] [4.1/4.2 Regression] segmentation fault

2006-10-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 03:57 --- The problem is that we have not layouted out the type yet, if we had with something like: template < class T > struct Rgb{}; Rgb t; template < int>int Camera1 () { sizeof (Rgb < int>); } We don't crash. Something

[Bug c++/29435] [4.1/4.2 Regression] segmentation fault

2006-10-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 03:48 --- Also ICEs with 4.2.0 20061012 but did not with 4.2.0 20061002 (which I think was built before PR 29226 came in). -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/29226] [4.0 regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:886

2006-10-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||29435 nThis|| http://gcc.g

[Bug c++/29435] [4.1 Regression] segmentation fault

2006-10-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 03:44 --- I think this was caused by PR 29226. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/29435] [4.1 Regression] segmentation fault

2006-10-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.1.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29435 --- You

[Bug c++/29435] [4.1 Regression] segmentation fault

2006-10-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 03:39 --- Works in 4.0.4 20061011. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known

[Bug c++/29435] [4.1 Regression] segmentation fault

2006-10-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 03:37 --- The code in comment # 5 is invalid but even if we make it valid like below, it still ICEs: template < class T > struct Rgb{}; template < int>int Camera1 () { sizeof (Rgb < int>); } -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug c++/29435] [4.1 Regression] segmentation fault

2006-10-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 03:36 --- Reduced testcase: template < class T > struct Rgb; template < int>int Camera1 () { sizeof (Rgb < int>); } -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Al-Manahel Newsletter List Unsubscription

2006-10-12 Thread munir
The removal of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Date of this removal: Wed Oct 11 19:49:46 2006 Please save this email message for future reference. --