Processed: Re: [PR29207] gij bus errors on hppa-linux-gnu and alpha-linux-gnu

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 364819 -1 Bug#364819: [PR29207] gij bus errors on hppa-linux-gnu and alpha-linux-gnu Bug 364819 cloned as bug 390982. > severity 364819 serious Bug#364819: [PR29207] gij bus errors on hppa-linux-gnu and alpha-linux-gnu Severity set to `serious' f

Bug#364819: [PR29207] gij bus errors on hppa-linux-gnu and alpha-linux-gnu

clone 364819 -1 severity 364819 serious close 364819 4.1.1ds1-14 thanks On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 08:10:59PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > tags 364819 - unreproducible > severity 364819 important > thanks > gij-4.1 now ignores the unaligned accesses. by running the interpreter > with "prctl --unal

[Bug target/29338] [4.1 regression] ICE on valid C++ code

-- fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot |

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user None # remote status report for #388626 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29226 # * remote status changed: NEW -> ASSIGNED usertags 388626 - status-NEW usertags 3

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user None # remote status report for #387728 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29105 # * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?

Bug#390620: arm-specific ICE on valid code

Richard B. Kreckel writes: > Package: g++-4.1 > Version: 4.1.1-10 > > According to > , > > the current GiNaC package FTBFS on arm. > > With access to an arm system, it will be very easy to gathe

Processed: forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 390620 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29338 Bug#390620: arm-specific ICE on valid code Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29338. > tags 390620 + upstream Bug#390620: arm-specific ICE on valid code There were no tag

Results for 4.1.2 20060928 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-15) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Thu Sep 28 20:57:22 UTC 2006 (revision 117289) Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 3) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 4) FAIL: g++.dg/loo

Results for 4.1.2 20060928 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-15) testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Thu Sep 28 20:57:22 UTC 2006 (revision 117289) Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 3) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 4) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/l

Results for 4.1.2 20060928 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-15) testsuite on i486-pc-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Thu Sep 28 20:57:22 UTC 2006 (revision 117289) Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 3) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 4) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/li

Results for 4.1.2 20060928 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-15) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Thu Sep 28 20:57:22 UTC 2006 (revision 117289) Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 3) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 4) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user None Selected user id (None) invalid, sorry > # remote status report for #387728 > # * http://gcc

Bug#390928: gij-4.1 uninstallable

forcemerge 390874 390928 thanks Bastian Blank writes: > unmerge 390928 > severity 390928 grave > thanks > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:14:25PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > even you, please recheck the BTS. kthxbye. > > Wrong bug. libgcj7-0 was not sheduled for installation. same bug. --

Processed: Re: Bug#390928: gij-4.1 uninstallable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unmerge 390928 Bug#390928: gij-4.1 uninstallable Bug is not marked as being merged with any others. > severity 390928 grave Bug#390928: gij-4.1 uninstallable Severity set to `grave' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#390928: gij-4.1 uninstallable

unmerge 390928 severity 390928 grave thanks On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:14:25PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > even you, please recheck the BTS. kthxbye. Wrong bug. libgcj7-0 was not sheduled for installation. Bastian -- Only a fool fights in a burning house. -- Kank the Klingon

Bug#390928: gij-4.1 uninstallable

forcemerge 390874 390928 thanks even you, please recheck the BTS. kthxbye. Bastian Blank writes: > Package: gij-4.1 > Version: 4.1.1-15 > Severity: grave > > | Setting up gij-4.1 (4.1.1-15) ... > | gcj-dbtool-4.1: error while loading shared libraries: libgcj.so.70: cannot > open shared object f

Bug#390532: marked as done (gcj-4.1: Dangeling symlink for man page rmic.1)

Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2006 20:56:23 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#390532: gcj-4.1: Dangeling symlink for man page rmic.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Processed: Re: Bug#390425: gij-4.1: dangling symlink rmiregistry.1.gz in /etc/alternatives

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 390425 Bug#390425: gij-4.1: dangling symlink rmiregistry.1.gz in /etc/alternatives 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thank

Bug#390928: gij-4.1 uninstallable

Package: gij-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-15 Severity: grave | Setting up gij-4.1 (4.1.1-15) ... | gcj-dbtool-4.1: error while loading shared libraries: libgcj.so.70: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory | dpkg: error processing gij-4.1 (--configure): | subprocess post-installation sc

Bug#390425: gij-4.1: dangling symlink rmiregistry.1.gz in /etc/alternatives

reopen 390425 thanks Hi, The issue is persistent in version 4.1.1-15. The 'postinst' script in the package contains the following code: update-alternatives --quiet \ --install /usr/bin/rmiregistry rmiregistry /usr/bin/grmiregistry-4.1 $prio \ --slave /usr/share/man/man1/rm

Bug#390425: marked as done (gij-4.1: dangling symlink rmiregistry.1.gz in /etc/alternatives)

Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2006 20:20:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#390425: gij-4.1: dangling symlink rmiregistry.1.gz in /etc/alternatives has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Processed: Re: gcj-dbtool-4.1 call in postinst segfaults on fresh installs on arm, hppa

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 387875 important Bug#387875: [PR29206] gcj-dbtool segfauls on hppa-linux and arm-linux Bug#388505: gcj-dbtool-4.1 call in postinst segfaults on fresh installs on arm, hppa Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing

Bug#387875: gcj-dbtool-4.1 call in postinst segfaults on fresh installs on arm, hppa

severity 387875 important thanks there's an ugly workaround in gcj-4.1_4.1.1-15, which just ignores gcj-dbtool's exit value. If the classmap db cannot be found, then gij isn't able to use the precompiled java byte-code. Call it a missed optimization for now. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Processed: Re: [PR29207] gij bus errors on hppa-linux-gnu and alpha-linux-gnu

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 364819 - unreproducible Bug#364819: [PR29207] gij bus errors on hppa-linux-gnu and alpha-linux-gnu Tags were: upstream unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible > severity 364819 important Bug#364819: [PR29207] gij bus errors on hppa-linux-gnu a

Bug#364819: [PR29207] gij bus errors on hppa-linux-gnu and alpha-linux-gnu

tags 364819 - unreproducible severity 364819 important thanks gij-4.1 now ignores the unaligned accesses. by running the interpreter with "prctl --unaligned=default". ecj-bootstrap did build on the buildd. I dont't see db4.4 build failures on alpha, the build failures on hppa have a workaround. l

Processed: mark pending gcc-4.1 report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 388263 + pending Bug#388263: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:4513 Tags were: upstream Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Bug#390874: libgcj7-0 uninstallable

Package: libgcj7-0 Version: 4.1.1-15 Severity: important Hi, When trying to uninstall libgcj7-0 i have the following output : rmdir: /var/lib/gcj-4.1: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing libgcj7-0 (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 Errors were enc

Processed: fixed in java-gcj-compat-dev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 383867 java-gcj-compat-dev Bug#383867: It shouldn't be possible to install ecj-bootstrap 3.2 with ecj-bootstrap-gcj 3.1.2 Bug reassigned from package `ecj-bootstrap' to `java-gcj-compat-dev'. > found 383867 1.0.65-1 Bug#383867: It shouldn't b

Bug#383867: marked as done (It shouldn't be possible to install ecj-bootstrap 3.2 with ecj-bootstrap-gcj 3.1.2)

Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:49:51 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in java-gcj-compat-dev has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Processed: forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 390694 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29329 Bug#390694: [arm] Internal consistency failure while building OpenSER 1.1.0-3 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29329. > tags 390694 + upstream fixed-upstream Bug#390694

Processed: #390693: gcc-4.1 fails to build the glibc on ia64

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 390693 4.1.1ds1-12 Bug#390693: gcc-4.1 fails to build the glibc on ia64 Bug marked as found in version 4.1.1ds1-12. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administr

Processed: Re: Bug#390654: gcj-4.1_4.1.1-15(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing argument?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 390654 + unreproducible Bug#390654: gcj-4.1_4.1.1-15(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing argument? There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sys

Bug#390654: gcj-4.1_4.1.1-15(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing argument?

tags 390654 + unreproducible thanks strange. works for me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#390776: marked as done (g77: can't install)

Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:01:37 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#390776: g77: can't install has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp