--- Comment #3 from acahalan at gmail dot com 2006-09-26 04:06 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> If you tried the page-of-functions idea, what would you do if you'd used all
> the functions on the page and needed another one?
>
You'd do the same as if you'd used up all the stack space.
Th
--- Comment #2 from geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 00:44 ---
If you tried the page-of-functions idea, what would you do if you'd used all
the functions on the page and needed another one?
--
geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
The subscription of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set. Thanks for subscribing!
Date of this subscription: Mon Sep 25 18:41:41 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
-
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 23:53 ---
Really there is no way to fix this without compiler help.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE|[4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE
|in make_decl_rtl, at
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 22:58 ---
Not enough information.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #25 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 22:54
---
*** Bug 29229 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 22:54 ---
You are incorrect. This code is invalid because argument dependent namelookup
does not have an effect on fundumental types.
This sentence is where it goes wrong:
Name lookup (3.4, 3.4.2) does not distinguish be
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 22:47 ---
This is a dup of bug 27096. Read the end for why this is not to be fixed for
4.1.x.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 27096 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Remov
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 22:47 ---
*** Bug 29228 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 22:44
---
*** Bug 29227 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 22:44 ---
This is an old problem really.
This is a dup of bug 19430.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19430 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Ad
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 22:36 ---
Reducing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29225
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 22:32 ---
Confirmed.
sizeof (int [w]));
is causing it.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
forwarded 382746 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29231
tags 382746 + upstream
thanks
Albert, please could you consider subscribing to the upstram report?
Albert Cahalan writes:
> Package: gcc-4.1
> Version: 4.1.1-5
> Severity: important
>
> __trampoline_setup in /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 puts code on the stack.
>
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:59:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-4.1: Manpages are missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 382746 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29231
Bug#382746: powerpc libgcc writes code to the stack
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29231.
> tags 382746 + upstream
Bug#382746: powerpc libgcc writes code to the stack
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 386174 http://gcc.gnu.org/29227
Bug#386174: gcc-4.1: gcc sometimes doesn't recognize uninitialized variables
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/29227.
> tags 386174 + upstream
Bug#386174: gcc-4.1: gcc somet
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-13
Severity: grave
Tags: pending, upstream, fixed-upstream
See http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29132.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 388263 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29225
Bug#388263: g++-4.1: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:4513
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29225.
> tags 388263 + upstream
Bug#388263: g++-4.1: ICE in gimplify_expr
Hi Christian,
(Sorry if you get this twice, I don't know whether you subscribe to
debian-devel.)
Christian Aichinger wrote:
> As Steve Langasek detailed in his d-d-a mail[1], unnecessary
> dependencies cause lots of problems, as they make transitions
> bigger then they need to be.
>
> The root c
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #364819
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29207
# * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED
usertags 364819 + statu
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #387990
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29128
# * remote status changed: NEW -> ASSIGNED
usertags 387990 - sta
tags 389366 +wontfix
thanks
Eddy Petrisor writes:
> Package: gcc-4.2-base
> Version: 4.2-20060923-1
> Severity: minor
>
> Please do not install hidden (duplicate) files.
no, needed for an upgrade error.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 389366 +wontfix
Bug#389366: gcc-4.2-base: please remove duplicate hiden files
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 17:33 ---
Subject: Bug 29203
Author: tromey
Date: Mon Sep 25 17:33:20 2006
New Revision: 117199
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117199
Log:
2006-09-25 Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Suggest
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 17:30 ---
Subject: Bug 29203
Author: tromey
Date: Mon Sep 25 17:30:21 2006
New Revision: 117197
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117197
Log:
2006-09-25 Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Suggest
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386864: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386926: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361942: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381022: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373257: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386910: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373257: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386430: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386430: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381022: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387826: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378325: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#312830: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#312830: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348792: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386228: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340874: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386910: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385974: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:17:44 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#246384: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds1-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Accepted:
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-14_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.1-14_hppa.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.1-14_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.1-14_powerpc.deb
fastjar_4.1.1-14_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.1-14_hppa.deb: package says section is libs, override says
devel.
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.1-14_i386.deb: package says section is libs, override says
devel.
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.1-14
gcc-4.1_4.1.1ds1-14_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lib64mudflap0_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
libffi4-dev_4.1.1-14_hppa.deb
libffi4_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
libmudflap0_4.1.1-14_powerpc.deb
lib64stdc++6_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
fixincludes_4.1.1-14_hppa.deb
fastjar_4.1.
--- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 15:04 ---
Either show that it is a regression, or dont put the regression marker in the
subject.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
John Schmidt writes:
> I then downloaded the gcc-4.1-source and checked if the PR debug/25468 fix
> was
> included in the source, and it wasn't.
it is. see the upstream changelog in the package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
gcj-4.1_4.1.1-14_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libgcj7-dbg_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
gcj-4.1_4.1.1-14.diff.gz
libgcj7-awt_4.1.1-14_hppa.deb
libgcj7-dev_4.1.1-14_hppa.deb
gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14_powerpc.deb
gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
libgcj7
The removal of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set.
Date of this removal: Sun Sep 24 13:54:57 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
--
The subscription of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set. Thanks for subscribing!
Date of this subscription: Sun Sep 24 13:54:50 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
-
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 05:19:32PM +1000, Peter Moulder wrote:
> Can this bug's title be changed to "Source package contains useless
> files", and accordingly its severity be reduced to minor or wishlist ?
Not as long as fsf-funding.7 is still in the source package.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: ht
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at developer dot classpath dot org
2006-09-24 15:19 ---
Subject: Bug 29203
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/classpath
Module name:classpath
Changes by: Mark Wielaard 06/09/24 15:17:45
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
native
I'm experiencing the same problem. It's driving me crazy that I can't run WINE anymore on most of my apps.err:module:load_builtin_dll failed to load .so lib for builtin L"gdi32.dll": /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version `GCC_4.2.0' not found (required by /usr/bin/../lib/libstdc++.so.6)
err:module:
gcc-4.2_4.2-20060923-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libstdc++6-4.2-doc_4.2-20060923-1_all.deb
gcc-4.2_4.2-20060923-1_powerpc.deb
gij-4.2_4.2-20060923-1_hppa.deb
gcc-4.2-doc_4.2-20060923-1_all.deb
libobjc2_4.2-20060923-1_hppa.deb
lib64mudflap0_4.
Package: gcc-4.2-base
Version: 4.2-20060923-1
Severity: minor
Please do not install hidden (duplicate) files.
$ dpkg -L gcc-4.2-base
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.2-base
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.2-base/changelog.gz
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.2-base/TODO.Debian
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.
Accepted:
gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14_hppa.deb
gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14_i386.deb
gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-14_pow
63 matches
Mail list logo
