Bug#362638: gcc-4.{0,1}-base still have duplicate files

gcc-4.0-base and gcc-4.1-base in unstable still have this bug: . ./gcc-4.0-base_4.0.3-6_i386.deb ./gcc-4.1-base_4.1.1-10_i386.deb ./gcc-4.1-base ./gcc-4.1-base/usr ./gcc-4.1-base/usr/share ./gcc-4.1-base/usr/share/doc ./gcc-4.1-base/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base ./gcc-4.1-base/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1

Results for 4.1.2 20060814 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-11) testsuite on i486-pc-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Aug 14 22:35:40 UTC 2006 (revision 116137) Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 3) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 4) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/li

Results for 4.1.2 20060814 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-11) testsuite on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Aug 14 22:35:40 UTC 2006 (revision 116137) Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 3) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 4) FAIL: g++.dg/l

Results for 4.1.2 20060814 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-11) testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Aug 14 22:35:40 UTC 2006 (revision 116137) Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 3) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 4) FAIL: g++.dg/look

Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

Package: g++-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-5 Severity: important The g++ version that recently entered testing exhibits the same problem I had been reported to the hppa maintainers -- and which Randolph report upstream at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28620 . I understand that it is fixed in

[Bug c++/24791] ICE on invalid instantiation of template's static member

--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 19:07 --- Btw, the ICE for the second testcase in comment #1 happens in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:11875 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24791 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You a

[Bug libmudflap/23170] [4.0 only] libmudflap should not use functions marked obsolescent by POSIX/SUS

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 18:36 --- Fixed in 4.1.0 so closing as such. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/28280] [4.2 regression] bogus "statement with no effect" warning with VLA and typeof

--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 18:04 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENE

[Bug c/28280] [4.2 regression] bogus "statement with no effect" warning with VLA and typeof

--- Comment #12 from mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 18:01 --- Subject: Bug 28280 Author: mrs Date: Tue Aug 15 18:01:19 2006 New Revision: 116163 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116163 Log: PR c/28280 * c-parser.c (c_parser_typeof_specifier):

[Bug c++/26757] C++ front-end producing two DECLs with the same UID

-- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.1.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757 --- Yo

[Bug c/28280] [4.2 regression] bogus "statement with no effect" warning with VLA and typeof

--- Comment #11 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 16:16 --- The patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/txt00017.txt is OK. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28280 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bu

[Bug libgcj/28312] peer libraries are installed into gcjversionedlibdir, not into nativeexeclib

-- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fitzsim at redhat dot com |dot org

[Bug libgcj/28312] peer libraries are installed into gcjversionedlibdir, not into nativeexeclib

--- Comment #6 from fitzsim at redhat dot com 2006-08-15 15:01 --- What are you trying to do, exactly? This is the intended behaviour, that libgcj's configure overrides classpath's configure by injecting --with-native-libdir. Here is the configure fragment: # Determine where the stand

Al-Manahel Newsletter List Unsubscription

The removal of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Date of this removal: Tue Aug 15 08:55:39 2006 Please save this email message for future reference. --

Bug#383185: Minor typo in gcc man page

Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-9 Severity: trivial This is a bug an Ubuntu user reported here : https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.0/+bug/56197 : I found a typo in 'man gcc' (default gcc-4.0.3, part in Ubuntu-6.06) $ man gcc [...] is taken into acount. [...] should obviously

[Bug target/28717] [4.2 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077 on s390

--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 12:05 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24367 *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

Processed: Re: Bug#382950: [s390] in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 382950 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24367 Bug#382950: [s390] in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077 Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24367. > tags 382950 + upstream Bug#382950: [s390] in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077

Bug#382950: [s390] in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077

forwarded 382950 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24367 tags 382950 + upstream thanks This is a dupe of PR24367. Maybe there's another bug report in Debian already too. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta