Sun Administration Server crashes since last libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 update

2006-08-04 Thread Alexander Scheibner
Dear ladies and gentlemen, Since the upgrade of libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 to version 2.95.4-27, the Administration Server, that ships with Sun Directory Server 5.2p4 does not start any more. The subprocesses, as far as I could see, get a SIGABRT. Simply copying the sarge version of /usr/lib/libstdc+

Results for 4.1.2 20060729 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-10) testsuite on mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-08-04 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 29 19:45:02 UTC 2006 (revision 115812) Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 3) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 4) FAIL: g++.dg/lo

Results for 4.1.2 20060729 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-10) testsuite on mips-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-08-04 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 29 19:45:02 UTC 2006 (revision 115812) Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 3) FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/linkage1.C (test for errors, line 4) FAIL: g++.dg/look

Results for 4.1.2 20060729 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-10) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-08-04 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 29 19:45:02 UTC 2006 (revision 115812) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu === libffi tests === Running target unix XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c execution test XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn1.c execution test XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn2.c ex

Results for 4.1.2 20060729 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-10) testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-08-04 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 29 19:45:02 UTC 2006 (revision 115812) Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu === libffi tests === Running target unix === libffi Summary === # of expected passes228 # of unsupported tests 2 ==

Results for 4.0.4 20060730 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.3-6) testsuite on m68k-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-08-04 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 30 00:54:11 UTC 2006 (revision 115817) Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/eh/omit-frame-pointer2.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/eh/registers1.C executi

Results for 4.0.4 20060730 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.3-6) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-08-04 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 30 00:54:11 UTC 2006 (revision 115817) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu === libffi tests === Running target unix XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c execution test XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn1.c execution test XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn2.c ex

Results for 4.0.4 20060730 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.3-6) testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-08-04 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 30 00:54:11 UTC 2006 (revision 115817) Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu === libffi tests === Running target unix === libffi Summary === # of expected passes219 # of unsupported tests 2 ==

[Bug rtl-optimization/28489] [4.2 regression] ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.c:1968

2006-08-04 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #12 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-08-04 21:18 --- The bootstrap and testing on my ia64 HP-UX system also had no regressions with this patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28489 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC

Processed: Re: Bug#381480: Acknowledgement (parser.ipp:40: ICE: Segmentation fault)

2006-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 381480 20060714-1 Bug#381480: parser.ipp:40: ICE: Segmentation fault Bug marked as found in version 20060714-1. > tags 381480 + upstream Bug#381480: parser.ipp:40: ICE: Segmentation fault There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > -- Stoppin

Bug#381480: parser.ipp:40: ICE: Segmentation fault

2006-08-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20060721-1 A fairly new one... > Automatic build of fityk_0.7.5-2 on usurper by sbuild/amd64 0.46 ... > if x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. > -DHELP_DIR=\"/usr/share/fityk/fityk\" -Wall -ftemplate-depth-50 -g -O2 -MT > ast.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/

[Bug c++/28599] multiple definitions of static const member of template class

2006-08-04 Thread tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 15:10 --- Has been fixed in Debian and upstream already. Please talk to your vendor. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28016 *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/28016] [4.1 Regression] emitting template constant

2006-08-04 Thread tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 15:10 --- *** Bug 28599 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

Processed: fixed for 4.2

2006-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 369938 + fixed-upstream Bug#369938: segfault in cgraph_decide_inlining_incrementally Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: mark ia64 bugs

2006-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 379885 [ia64] ICE in ia64_expand_move, at config/ia64/ia64.c:1088 Bug#379885: ICE in ia64_expand_move, at config/ia64/ia64.c:1088 Changed Bug title. > retitle 379886 [ia64] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2448 Bug#379886: ICE in final_scan_i

Bug#381405: Upgrade

2006-08-04 Thread Filipus Klutiero
severity 381405 serious thanks There are i386 binaries of gcj-4.0 in unstable and gcj-4.0 currently FTBFS in sid according to Julien. The removal of gnat-4.0 should reach testing soon, while the gcj-4.0 RM is blocked by a bug still unfixed in unstable, so it seems that this will soon be an RC

Bug#368397: CVE-2006-3619: directory traversal vulnerability

2006-08-04 Thread Martin Schulze
retitle 368397 CVE-2006-3619: directory traversal vulnerability thanks This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-3619. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-3619 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. Re

Processed: CVE-2006-3619: directory traversal vulnerability

2006-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 368397 CVE-2006-3619: directory traversal vulnerability Bug#368397: fastjar: CVE-2005-3990: directory traversal vulnerability Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Processed: Upgrade

2006-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 381405 serious Bug#381405: gcj-4.0: FTBFS: gnat-4.0 has no installation candidate Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Re: Bug#381405: gcj-4.0: FTBFS: gnat-4.0 has no installation candidate

2006-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 381405 Bug#381405: gcj-4.0: FTBFS: gnat-4.0 has no installation candidate Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#381405: gcj-4.0: FTBFS: gnat-4.0 has no installation candidate

2006-08-04 Thread Julien Danjou
reopen 381405 thanks On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 09:44:47AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > this package is scheduled for removal. Please, close bugs when the package is actually removed, not before. -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debia

Processed: Re: Bug#381405: gcj-4.0: FTBFS: gnat-4.0 has no installation candidate

2006-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 381405 + wontfix Bug#381405: gcj-4.0: FTBFS: gnat-4.0 has no installation candidate There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > tags 381405 + pending Bug#381405: gcj-4.0: FTBFS: gnat-4.0 has no installation candidate Tags were: wontfix Tags adde

Bug#379886: same cause

2006-08-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
forwarded 379886 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28490 thanks Apparently this bug is really the same as #379885: ICE in ia64_expand_move, at config/ia64/ia64.c:1088. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Processed: same cause

2006-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 379886 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28490 Bug#379886: ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2448 Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28495 to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28490. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Bug#381405: marked as done (gcj-4.0: FTBFS: gnat-4.0 has no installation candidate)

2006-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
9 > Build started at 20060804-0551 > ** > Checking available source versions... > Fetching source files... > Reading package lists... > Building dependency tree... > Need to get 33.6MB of source archives. &g

Processed: Re: Bug#381384: Acknowledgement ([gnat] ICE in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5513)

2006-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 381384 + upstream Bug#381384: [gnat] ICE in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5513 There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 381384 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28591 Bug#381384: [gnat] ICE in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5513 Noted your

Bug#379886: [Bug target/28495] [4.2 regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2448

2006-08-04 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 01:49 --- This is the same bug as PR 28490. I verified that my prototype patch for PR 28490 fixes it. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28490 *** -- wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What