[Bug libstdc++/19664] libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around the declarations

--- Comment #100 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-28 04:57 --- Subject: Bug 19664 Author: bkoz Date: Fri Jul 28 04:57:34 2006 New Revision: 115790 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115790 Log: 2006-07-27 Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR libs

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status rep

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #370594 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27907 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED # * remote reso

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #380121 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21299 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 380121 + status-NEW t

Processed: change submitter email

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 106900 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#106900: gnomp3: segfault Changed Bug submitter from Steve M. Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 133218 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#133218: dmalloc: bad docbase section Changed Bug submitter fr

Bug#379866: Log for failed build of parrot_0.4.5-1 (dist=unstable4)

> Automatic build of parrot_0.4.5-1 on coconut0.coconut.gelato.org by > sbuild/ia64 0.49 ... > src/ops/experimental.ops: In function 'cgp_core': > src/ops/experimental.ops:387: internal compiler error: in move_insn, at > haifa-sched.c:1968 > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed so

Processed: Re: Bug#380121: Acknowledgement (ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393 for invalid assembler)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 380121 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21299 Bug#380121: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393 for invalid assembler Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21299. > -- Stopping processing here. Plea

Bug#380121: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393 for invalid assembler

Package: gcc-4.1 Severity: minor Tags: upstream You get an ICE in in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:393 with some invalid assembler command. This affects 3.x up to current 4.x mainline. On e.g. IA-64 you see it with: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/svgalib-1.4.3$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bi

[Bug target/28495] [4.2 regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2448

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug target/28495] [4.2 regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2448

--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-07-27 08:59 --- Created an attachment (id=11955) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11955&action=view) test case Testcase from application "ickle". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28495 --- You are

Al-Manahel Newsletter List Unsubscription

The removal of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Date of this removal: Thu Jul 27 02:29:53 2006 Please save this email message for future reference. --

Welcome to Al-Manahel Newsletter List

The subscription of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Thanks for subscribing! Date of this subscription: Thu Jul 27 02:29:43 2006 Please save this email message for future reference. -

[Bug java/8923] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE when modifying a variable decleared "final static"

--- Comment #8 from simartin at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-07-27 07:06 --- I've posted a patch for the test case given in comment #6 here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/msg01142.html -- simartin at users dot sourceforge dot net changed: What|Remov