LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 15 14:57:20 UTC 2006 (revision 115474)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c36204d
FAIL: cd5014e
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2315
# of unexpected failures2
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 15 14:57:20 UTC 2006 (revision 115474)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn1.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn2.c ex
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_3_4_6_release revision 111785
Native configuration is ia64-linux-gnu (caballero)
=== gpc tests ===
Running target any
FAIL: chief40.pas
FAIL: chuck6.pas
FAIL: fieldw.pas
FAIL: fjf23.pas
FAIL: fjf30b.pas
FAIL: fjf327.pas
FAIL: fjf526a.pas
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jun 30 10:39:17 UTC 2006 (revision 115087)
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes10996
# of
--- Comment #2 from jason at redhat dot com 2006-07-19 20:02 ---
Subject: Re: New: Anon namespace pointers in exported classes
Yes, this is an ODR violation. However, the patch I'm working on will
allow it to compile (as a side effect of other desired changes).
Jason
--
http:/
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-19 17:38
---
This test case now works for me on both the 4.1 and 4.2 branches.
Martin, would you please confirm that, at your convenience?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28225
--- You are receiving th
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> >> Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > So you're saying the only way is to compile, link, and test
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mueller at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-19 15:45 ---
B violates ODR rules as the class for A is different between the TUs as it is
in an anon namespace.
See PR 28360 for full details.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28360 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-19 15:45 ---
*** Bug 28438 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
The original message was received at Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:58:16 +0500
from 2.187.217.128
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
The removal of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set.
Date of this removal: Wed Jul 19 06:34:41 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
--
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-19 11:40
---
Here's a slightly shorter testcase:
=
struct A
{
char c[13];
int k[1];
};
struct A a[1];
void foo(int* p)
{
int i, j;
for (i=0; i<2; ++i)
if (memcmp (a[i].k, p
13 matches
Mail list logo
