Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-7
Tags: +patch
Followup-For: Bug #377012
Hi,
The attached patch just differentiates the libssp name
-i
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Sh
Dear Debian folks--
I have used the synaptic package manager to install gfortran-4.0 on my
linux/ubuntu machine. The library package libgfortran0 was also installed
(version 4.0.3-lubuntu5). But somehow the libraries are messed up.
In particular, the following program "hello.f90":
program hell
The subscription of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set. Thanks for subscribing!
Date of this subscription: Thu Jul 6 14:10:03 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
-
I just uploaded texmaker-1.3-2 and it built fine on everything except arm. Texmaker-1.3-1 built fine on all architectures and made it into testing flawlessly. I am a little confused because all I thought I changed was stuff for the man page and descriptions of the package.
I was emailing this
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 15:13 ---
Most likely caused by:
2006-05-18 Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix up vla, vm and [*] sematics.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 15:12 ---
We are warning inside the typeof.
Here is a shorter testcase:
void f(__SIZE_TYPE__ d)
{
typedef int t[d];
t *g = (__typeof(g))d;
}
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fche at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28280
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 14:51 ---
This is not a debug issue.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|debug |c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28280
--- You are
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 10:11 ---
Really looks like a dup of PR27291, but the patch for that doesn't apply to the
4.1 branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28221
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on t
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 10:10 ---
ICE is after rtl loop2 optimizer, looks like it requires a doloop target.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 10:07 ---
The reduced testcases are with checking only.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 10:02 ---
So, confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|U
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 10:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=11843)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11843&action=view)
testcase
reduced C++ testcase attached. C testcase:
void foo(void)
{
int value47D2367, valueD2287;
unsign
gcc-defaults_1.38_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-defaults_1.38.dsc
gcc-defaults_1.38.tar.gz
cpp_4.1.1-3_i386.deb
cpp-doc_4.1.1-3_i386.deb
gcc_4.1.1-3_i386.deb
gcc-doc_4.1.1-3_i386.deb
gnat_4.1.1-3_i386.deb
gnat-doc_4.1.1-3_i386.deb
g++_4.
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
cpp-doc_4.1.1-3_i386.deb: package says section is doc, override says devel.
gcc-doc_4.1.1-3_i386.deb: package says section is doc, override says devel.
gfortran-doc_4.1.1-3_i386.deb: packag
Accepted:
cpp-doc_4.1.1-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp-doc_4.1.1-3_i386.deb
cpp_4.1.1-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.1.1-3_i386.deb
g++_4.1.1-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4.1.1-3_i386.deb
g77-doc_3.4.6-7_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77-doc_3
tags 376616 upstream
forwarded 376616 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28280
block 376895 by 376616
thanks
* Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-05 17:53]:
> I can reproduce this bug with attached file (test.c):
Thanks a lot for the testcase. I've been travelling and haven't had
time to look
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 376616 upstream
Bug#376616: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: warning: statement with no effect
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 376616 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28280
Bug#376616: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: warning: statement with no effect
Noted yo
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
||debian
Hello,
I just updated the affected packages on my system, and still get the
original problem:
# /etc/init.d/apt-proxy start
Starting apt-proxy
Failed to load application: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data
.
after I did
# /usr/bin/apt-get -f install gcc-4.1
Reading package lists... Don
* Frank Ch. Eigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-04 13:51]:
> According to Roland McGrath, this is likely a bug in gcc rather than
> elfutils. Would you mind redirecting the bug report in that
> direction?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28280
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.co
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-7
Severity: important
Hi,
Since gcc-4.1 (the system gcc) provides libssp0-dev, this makes a
cross compiler (which is also trying to provide it) uninstallable
along side it. e.g.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/cross$ sudo dpkg -i
gcc-4.1-ia64-linux-gnu_4.1.1-7_i386.deb
dp
23 matches
Mail list logo
