problems with g++-4.1

2006-06-07 Thread Alex Romosan
this program: #include #include struct A { void* operator new(size_t alloc_size) { printf("A::operator new()\n"); return malloc(alloc_size); }; void operator delete(void* p, size_t s) { printf("A::delete %d\n", s); }; A(

give-and-take

2006-06-07 Thread Isold Mccoy
We focus on stocks that have great potential to move up in price!!! Current price word on the sreet is this could take off at any moment and double. When this Stock moves - WATCH OUT! Trading Date : Monday, June 7, 2006 Company : AbsoluteSKY T i c k e r : A B S Y Opening Price : $0.95 Project

Results for 4.1.2 20060604 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-2) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-06-07 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 4 18:50:03 UTC 2006 (revision 114362) === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2317 # of unexpected failures0 Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Runnin

Results for 4.1.2 20060604 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-2) testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

2006-06-07 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 4 18:50:03 UTC 2006 (revision 114362) === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2317 # of unexpected failures0 Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running tar

Results for 4.1.2 20060604 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-2) testsuite on mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-06-07 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 4 18:50:03 UTC 2006 (revision 114362) === acats tests === FAIL: c96005d FAIL: cc3120a === acats Summary === # of expected passes1959 # of unexpected failures2 # of unsupported tests 356 Native configuration is

Results for 4.1.2 20060604 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-2) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-06-07 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 4 18:50:03 UTC 2006 (revision 114362) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu === libffi tests === Running target unix XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c execution test XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn1.c execution test XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn2.c ex

Results for 4.1.2 20060604 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-2) testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-06-07 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 4 18:50:03 UTC 2006 (revision 114362) Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu === libffi tests === Running target unix === libffi Summary === # of expected passes228 # of unsupported tests 2 ==

Results for 4.1.2 20060604 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-2) testsuite on mips-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-06-07 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 4 18:50:03 UTC 2006 (revision 114362) === acats tests === FAIL: c96005d FAIL: cc3120a === acats Summary === # of expected passes1959 # of unexpected failures2 # of unsupported tests 356 Native configuration is

butte staggeringly

2006-06-07 Thread Joy Foster
***BREAKING NEWS ALERT ISSUED Rumor's circulating and keeping the focus on the company's news. We want to congratulate all of our members who read our Trading Alert on A B S Y last time. Put it on your radar screen right now. Trade Date : 7 June 2006 Company Name : AbsoluteSKY, Inc. S y m b

valgrind reports memleak when std::ios:sync_with_stdio(false)

2006-06-07 Thread Mirko Maischberger
>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Mirko Maischberger >Confidential: no >Synopsis: valgrind reports memleak when std::ios:sync_with_stdio(false) >Severity: serious >Priority: low >Category: libstdc++ >Class: sw-bug >Release: gcc-4.1 (GCC) 4.1.1 20060511 (prerele

Bug#331150: Bug #331150: [m68k] gcc segfaults with -g -fomit-frame-pointer

2006-06-07 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:15:39PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:43:47AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > crest% wget http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/misc/kernel.i > > crest% gcc-4.0 -c -O1 -fomit-frame-pointer -g -o kernel.o kernel.i > > I just did this with g

Bug#331150: Bug #331150: [m68k] gcc segfaults with -g -fomit-frame-pointer

2006-06-07 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:33:13PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > I did try gcc-4.1 and it produced correct code under my tests. Great. > Given that gcc-4.1 is now the default compiler, are you still interested > with problems with gcc-4.0 ? No. The faster I get gcc-4.0 behind me, the happier I

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

2006-06-07 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #370594 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27907 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 370594 + status-N

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

2006-06-07 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #212248 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13946 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED # * remote resolutio

Bug#369938: Log for failed build of xmlrpc++_0.7+cvs20040713-1 (dist=unstable)

2006-06-07 Thread Martin Michlmayr
You cannot see it here but this is the same: > Automatic build of xmlrpc++_0.7+cvs20040713-1 on > test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by sbuild/powerpc 0.44 ... > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -g -Wall -O2 -c XmlRpcValue.cpp -o > XmlRpcValue.o >/dev/null 2>&1 > make[3]: *** [XmlRpcValue.lo] Error

Processed: more 4.1 bugs

2006-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > block 366820 by 369424 Bug#366820: Transition to GCC 4.1 for etch Was blocked by: 275774 339921 355163 355165 355189 355325 355326 355352 355396 355463 355598 355599 355663 355738 355739 355741 355744 355841 355980 355983 355986 355988 355989 355990 3

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

2006-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

Bug#370602: marked as done ([m68k] please make gcc-4.1 default)

2006-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 7 Jun 2006 12:17:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 1.36 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#370594: Log for failed build of ufraw_0.5+cvs20051021-1 (dist=testing)

2006-06-07 Thread Martin Michlmayr
and here: > Automatic build of ufraw_0.5+cvs20051021-1 on juist by sbuild/alpha 0.44 ... > if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/include -I/usr/include/libexif > -I/usr/include/gimp-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 > -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I

Welcome to Al-Manahel Newsletter List

2006-06-07 Thread munir
The subscription of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Thanks for subscribing! Date of this subscription: Tue Jun 6 17:54:53 2006 Please save this email message for future reference. -