#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #369606
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27830
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags 369606 + status-N
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 369719 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27841
Bug#369719: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have symbol_memory_tag in
verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27841.
> tags 369719 + upstrea
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20060508-1
Forwarded as PR27841.
> Automatic build of r-base_2.3.0-1 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by
> sbuild/powerpc 0.44
...
> gcc -I. -I../../src/include -I../../src/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fpic
> -std=gnu99 -O2 -pipe -c complex.c -o complex.o
> com
Please replace the previous patch with this patch against 4.1.0-4.
More explanation may be needed for Pascal.
[Ludovic Brenta]
* debian/copyright: Mention Ada packages (Closes: #366744).
Reorganise the explanation on the various packages. Explain
biarch. List all binary packages buil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 369710 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27804
Bug#369710: ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional'
(error_mark) in ocp_convert, at cp/cvt.c:630
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27804.
> tags 3697
> Since m68k pretty much depends on the gcc-4.1 transition to make it in
> again, I would suggest that we (as in, the m68k port) make the switch to
> GCC4.1 as the default already. This will allow us to verify that stuff
> actually builds and works, and to catch up with building those that fail
> w
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:01:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > BTW, can you tell me anything about the dip in
> > http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-quarter-big.png for m68k? Seems to be
> > heading in the wrong direction again for being a release candidate. I see
> > 12 buildds activel
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:35:47PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> [You had removed m68k-build from the Cc list. Was that on purpose?]
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:01:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > BTW, can you tell me anything about the dip in
> > http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-qu
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.0-4
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
this is the failure:
|patching file gcc/ada/adaint.c
|Hunk #1 FAILED at 261.
|1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gcc/ada/adaint.c.rej
this is the second one:
|/build/buildd/gcc-4.1-4.1.0/build/./gcc/xgcc
|-B/bu
[You had removed m68k-build from the Cc list. Was that on purpose?]
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:01:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> BTW, can you tell me anything about the dip in
> http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-quarter-big.png for m68k? Seems to be
> heading in the wrong direction again
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 16:47:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060530-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:39:19AM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > retitle 369642 g++-4.0/alpha: -fvisibility-inlines-hidden segfaults on
> > reference to static method
> > thanks
> > Minimal test case attached, bug title updated accordingly. Build w
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 05:52:43PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
>
> > >I tried it on akire, but was interrupted by real world issues.
> > >When you could give a more detailed HowTo (sbuild, dpkg-buildpackage,
> > >whatever) I would retry...
> > Very easy:
> > dget http://people.debian.org/~au
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 369606 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27830
Bug#369606: ICE: verify_stmts failed
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27830.
> tags 369606 + upstream
Bug#369606: ICE: verify_stmts failed
There were no tags set.
Tags
Hire,
i am here sitting in the internet caffe. Found your email and
adecaided to write. I might be coming to your aplace in !14 days,
so I decided to email you. May be wea can meet? Ia am 25 y.o.
girl. I have a picture ifa you want. No need to reply here as
this is not m!y email. Write me at [EMA
24 matches
Mail list logo
