Package:gcc-4.0
Version:4.0.3-3
Serverity:wishlist
The following patch files have a same path to create
gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/switch-1.c.
debian/patches/pr-26557.dpatch
debian/patches/svn-updates.dpath
I think pr-26557.dpatch will not be needed.
Regards,
Kazuhiro Inaoka
--
T
Package: gcc-2.95
Version: 1:2.95.4-24
Severity: normal
The file is_pair.c below compiled with
gcc-2.95 -O2 -S is_pair.c
results in the following in is_pair.s
movl (%ebx),%edx
testb $6,%bl
jne .L10
which I believe is incorrect for the input.
Those insns are fro
The removal of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set.
Date of this removal: Wed May 17 16:10:52 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
--
--- Comment #24 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 20:38
---
Removing the 4.1 marker, as this is now fixed on the 4.1 branch.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
X-send-pr-version: 3.113
X-GNATS-Notify:
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Thomas Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:05:17 +0200
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Thomas Richter
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: ICE on attribute cast
>Severity: ser
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 16:45 ---
Both of the testcases here were fixed by the patch for PR 27373.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 27373 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 16:45
---
*** Bug 27085 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Package: gfortran-4.1
Version: 4.1.0-4
Severity: normal
gfortran-4.1 is currently uninstallable on Sid. The exact errors I am getting
are
$wajig install gfortran-4.1
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
re
Package: gcc
Version: 4:4.0.2-2
Summary:
GCC should be more tolerant of
gcc -Wno-this-is-not-a-recognised-warning
as specified in detail below.
Discussion:
Occasionally, GCC introduces new warnings. For example, GCC 4 has
introduced warnings about discrepancies in signedness of integers
poi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 152473 + sid
Bug#152473: toolame: creates stereo only
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> tag 152791 + sid
Bug#152791: miscfiles: typos in constitution
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> tag 162663 + sid
Bug#162663: libc0.3-dev: depen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 367652 + upstream
Bug#367652: segfault, related to constructor instantiation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 367652 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27640
Bug#367652: segfault, related to constructor instantiation
Noted your statement
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20060508-1
I forwarded this as PR27640.
> Automatic build of sfs_1:0.8-0+pre20060514.1-1 on
> test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by sbuild/powerpc 0.44
...
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/build/tbm/sfs-0.8-0+pre20060514.1/./sfsrwcd -I..
> -I/build/tbm/sfs-0.8-0+pre20060
--- Comment #5 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-05-17 12:49 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Actually the orginal testcase here was not fixed by the patch which is going
> to
> fix PR 26626 either.
> So reopening.
Daniel, since you fixed 26626, do you think you could take a look at this o
13 matches
Mail list logo