Bug#361806: marked as done (java-gcj-compat-dev: Can't build with javac)

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 07:32:20 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Can't build with javac has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#361608: marked as done (ecj-bootstrap: takes over /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/javac with ../../../../bin/ecj)

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 07:21:25 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ecj-bootstrap: takes over /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/javac with ../../../../bin/ecj has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#361285: marked as done (java-gcj-compat_1.0.54-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: error: invalid Python installation)

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 07:20:00 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line java-gcj-compat_1.0.54-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: error: invalid Python installation has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#367448: gcc-3.4:[Patch] Removed autoreconf patch, Fixed some bugs.

2006-05-15 Thread Kazuhiro Inaoka
Package:gcc-3.4 Version:3.4.6-1 Severity:wishlist Tags:patch Could you please apply the following patch? This patch is to fix some problems. Remove a patahes/autoconf.dpatch because it has not already conflicted. The following patches have been applied to gcc-3.4 to fix some bugs. m32r-remove-ad

Bug#367435: lib32gcc1: Will not install: conflicts with libgcc1

2006-05-15 Thread Matthias Klose
reassign 367435 ia32-libs severity 367435 serious thanks plus: the package depends on lib32stdc++6, which doesn't exist for ia64. Peter Chubb writes: > Package: lib32gcc1 > Version: 1:4.0.2-9+ia32.libs.1.6 > Severity: normal > > When I try to install lib32gcc1, I see: > Preparing to replace li

Processed: Re: Bug#367435: lib32gcc1: Will not install: conflicts with libgcc1

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 367435 ia32-libs Bug#367435: lib32gcc1: Will not install: conflicts with libgcc1 Bug reassigned from package `lib32gcc1' to `ia32-libs'. > severity 367435 serious Bug#367435: lib32gcc1: Will not install: conflicts with libgcc1 Severity set to

Results for 4.1.1 20060511 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.0-4) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu

2006-05-15 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Thu May 11 02:29:54 UTC 2006 (revision 113691) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu === libffi tests === Running target unix XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c execution test XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn1.c execution test XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn2.c ex

Bug#367435: lib32gcc1: Will not install: conflicts with libgcc1

2006-05-15 Thread Peter Chubb
Package: lib32gcc1 Version: 1:4.0.2-9+ia32.libs.1.6 Severity: normal When I try to install lib32gcc1, I see: Preparing to replace lib32gcc1 1:3.4.3-12+ia32.libs.1.5 (using .../lib32gcc1_1%3a4.0.2-9+ia32.libs.1.6_ia64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement lib32gcc1 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

2006-05-15 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #335078 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14261 # * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution cha

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

Bug#355972: marked as done (undefined symbol: GC_pthread_create)

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356640: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.56-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#363619: marked as done (Spelling mistake in package description)

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363619: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.35 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#356640: marked as done (undefined symbol: GC_pthread_create)

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355972: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.56-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#365039: marked as done (gcc: c99 calls cc expecting it to be gcc)

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365039: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.35 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#350801: marked as done (/usr/bin/javac: Too many levels of symbolic links)

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#350801: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.56-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#355972: marked as done (undefined symbol: GC_pthread_create)

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355972: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.56-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#365934: marked as done (java-gcj-compat-dev: Dead links in /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/include/)

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365934: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.56-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#358932: marked as done (missing jni_md.h link)

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#358932: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.56-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#356640: marked as done (undefined symbol: GC_pthread_create)

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356640: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.56-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

[Bug target/26555] unrecognizable insn on IA64

2006-05-15 Thread roger at eyesopen dot com
-- Bug 26555 depends on bug 14261, which changed state. Bug 14261 Summary: ICE due to if-conversion http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14261 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug rtl-optimization/14261] ICE due to if-conversion

2006-05-15 Thread roger at eyesopen dot com
--- Comment #5 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-05-15 17:37 --- This should now be fixed on both mainline and the 4.1 branch. Thanks Andreas. -- roger at eyesopen dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

java-gcj-compat_1.0.56-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.56-1_i386.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.56-1_i386.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.56-1.diff.gz to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.0.56-1.diff.gz java-gcj-compat_1.0.56-1.dsc to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.

gcc-defaults_1.35_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-05-15 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: chill_2.95.4-50_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-50_i386.deb cpp-doc_4.0.3-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp-doc_4.0.3-4_i386.deb cpp_4.0.3-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.0.3-4_i386.deb g++_4.0.3-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4

Processing of java-gcj-compat_1.0.56-1_i386.changes

2006-05-15 Thread Archive Administrator
java-gcj-compat_1.0.56-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-gcj-compat_1.0.56-1.dsc java-gcj-compat_1.0.56.orig.tar.gz java-gcj-compat_1.0.56-1.diff.gz java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.56-1_i386.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.56-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your

Processing of gcc-defaults_1.35_i386.changes

2006-05-15 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-defaults_1.35_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-defaults_1.35.dsc gcc-defaults_1.35.tar.gz cpp_4.0.3-4_i386.deb cpp-doc_4.0.3-4_i386.deb gcc_4.0.3-4_i386.deb gcc-doc_4.0.3-4_i386.deb g++_4.0.3-4_i386.deb gobjc_4.0.3-4_i386.deb gobjc++_4.