--- Comment #11 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-09 02:08
---
Fixed
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-09 01:28
---
Subject: Bug 27093
Author: dberlin
Date: Tue May 9 01:28:47 2006
New Revision: 113641
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113641
Log:
2006-05-08 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix
Accepted:
cpp-4.1_4.1.0-3_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.0-3_hppa.deb
fastjar_4.1.0-3_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fastjar_4.1.0-3_hppa.deb
fixincludes_4.1.0-3_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fixincludes_4.1.0-3_hppa.deb
g++-4.1_4.1.0-3_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/g++-4
gcc-4.1_4.1.0-3_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.0-3_hppa.deb
libgcc4_4.1.0-3_hppa.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.0-3_hppa.deb
protoize_4.1.0-3_hppa.deb
fixincludes_4.1.0-3_hppa.deb
libmudflap0_4.1.0-3_hppa.deb
libmudflap0-dev_4.1.0-3_hppa.deb
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 7 11:05:59 UTC 2006 (revision 113598)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c96005d
FAIL: cc3120a
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes1959
# of unexpected failures2
# of unsupported tests 356
Native configuration is
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 7 11:05:59 UTC 2006 (revision 113598)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2317
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running tar
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 7 11:05:59 UTC 2006 (revision 113598)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2317
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Runn
98
/home/tbm/scratch/gcc-snapshot-20060508/build/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++
version 4.2.0 20060508 (experimental)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20050121-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-6.c execution, -O0
FAIL
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 7 11:05:59 UTC 2006 (revision 113598)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cd5011m
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2316
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 7 11:05:59 UTC 2006 (revision 113598)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cxf3a01
FAIL: cxf3a02
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2315
# of unexpected failures2
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 7 11:05:59 UTC 2006 (revision 113598)
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes228
# of unsupported tests 2
==
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 7 07:45:40 UTC 2006 (revision 113594)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c36204d
FAIL: c87b03a
FAIL: c9a009a
FAIL: c9a009c
FAIL: c9a009h
FAIL: c9a010a
FAIL: cb4009a
FAIL: cd5014e
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes23
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 7 07:45:40 UTC 2006 (revision 113594)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c94006a
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2319
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ te
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 7 07:45:40 UTC 2006 (revision 113594)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c35502d
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2319
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests =
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 7 07:45:40 UTC 2006 (revision 113594)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cxf3a01
FAIL: cxf3a02
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2318
# of unexpected failures2
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 7 07:45:40 UTC 2006 (revision 113594)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 7 07:45:40 UTC 2006 (revision 113594)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c72002a
FAIL: c97307a
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2318
# of unexpected failures2
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 7 07:45:40 UTC 2006 (revision 113594)
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes219
# of unsupported tests 2
==
--- Comment #15 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 21:10 ---
Subject: Bug 27158
Author: sayle
Date: Mon May 8 21:09:49 2006
New Revision: 113632
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113632
Log:
PR target/27158
* reload.c (find_reloads_toplev
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20060508-1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20060508-1_powerpc.deb
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 22:46:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366377: gcc-4.1: does not optimize sibling calls with args
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Mon, 8 May 2006 22:16:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060508-1 (source amd64)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 8 May 2006 22:16:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060419-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Mon, 8 May 2006 22:16:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060508-1 (source amd64)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 8 May 2006 22:16:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060419-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Mon, 8 May 2006 22:16:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060419-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Mon, 8 May 2006 22:16:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060508-1 (source amd64)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 8 May 2006 22:16:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060508-1 (source amd64)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 8 May 2006 22:16:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060508-1 (source amd64)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 8 May 2006 22:16:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060508-1 (source amd64)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 8 May 2006 22:16:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060419-1 (source i386 amd64 powerpc)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Quoth Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 2006-05-08 19:45:21 +0200:
> * Drake Wilson:
>
> > extern int foo(int x);
> > int bar(void) { return foo(32); }
> >
> > On i386 this compiles to
> >
> > pushl %ebp
> > movl%esp, %ebp
> > subl$8, %esp
> > mov
Your message dated Mon, 8 May 2006 22:16:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060508-1 (source amd64)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
* Drake Wilson:
> extern int foo(int x);
> int bar(void) { return foo(32); }
>
> On i386 this compiles to
>
> pushl %ebp
> movl%esp, %ebp
> subl$8, %esp
> movl$32, (%esp)
> callfoo
> leave
> ret
>
> which doesn't correct
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 361407 + fixed
Bug#361407: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree_list
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed
> tag 361441 + fixed
Bug#361441: internal compiler error: in add_virtual_operand, at
tree-ssa-operands.c
Tags were: fixed-upst
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 13:10:18 +0200
Source: gcc-snapshot
Binary: gcc-snapshot
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 20060508-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers
Changed-By: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
gcc-snapshot - A SN
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20060508-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20060508-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20060508-1.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20060508-1.tar.gz
gcc-snapshot_20060508-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20060508-1_amd64.deb
Announcing t
gcc-snapshot_20060508-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20060508-1_powerpc.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-snapshot_20060508-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20060508-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20060508-1.tar.gz
gcc-snapshot_20060508-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
* Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-23 07:18]:
> When building 'gcc-snapshot' on ppc64/unstable,
> I get the following error:
...
> With the attached patch 'gcc-snapshot' can be compiled on ppc64.
Sorry, I forgot to put this patch into the new upload. I'll put it
into the next one, pro
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #361883
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27116
# * remote status changed: NEW -> ASSIGNED
usertags 361883 - sta
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 07:56
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
42 matches
Mail list logo
