--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-04-18 21:36 ---
For the record, this happens on x86_64, but not on i386 or powerpc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27207
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are wa
Hi,
aHope I am not writibng tao wrong address. I am nice, pretty looking
girl. I am planning obn visiting your town this month. Can
we meet each other in person? Message me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||debian-gcc at lists dot
||debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 361602 + upstream
Bug#361602: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 361602 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27207
Bug#361602: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed
Noted your s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 361501 + fixed-upstream
Bug#361501: internal compiler error: in merge_alias_info, at tree-ssa-copy.c
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
tags 361501 + fixed-upstream
thanks
This PR has been marked as resolved by upstream. I can confirm that
the following 3 packages which had problems before build fine with
4.2.0 20060415:
acm4
snowdrop
gcl
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
--- Comment #10 from law at redhat dot com 2006-04-18 17:24 ---
Patch installed on 4.1 branch too.
--
law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #9 from law at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-18 17:22 ---
Subject: Bug 27087
Author: law
Date: Tue Apr 18 17:22:05 2006
New Revision: 113051
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113051
Log:
PR tree-optimization/27087
* tree-ssa-copy.c (may_pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 361569 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27149
Bug#361569: "the address of x, will always evaluate" warning not grammaticial
Forwarded-to-address changed from gcc.gnu.org/PR27149 to
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27149.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 361426 361445
Bug#361426: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: recompile with -fPIC
Bug#361445: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: recompile with -fPIC
Merged 361426 361445.
> retitle 361426 x86_x64 PIC problems and hidden vs anonymous namespaces
Bug#361426: FTBFS with GCC 4.2:
--- Comment #12 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-04-18 15:26 ---
also fails on 4.2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27158
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
--- Comment #11 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-04-18 15:20 ---
... but then anyway the bug pops up in reload. So it is definitely the same
bug as PR24230, and here is a modified version of the PR24230 testcase:
/* Compile with -O2 -maltivec */
#define REGLIST
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-18 10:49]:
> > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/../lib64/libipq.a(libipq.o): relocation
> > R_X86_64_32 against
> > `a local symbol' cannot be used when making a shared object;
> > recompile with -fPIC
>
> This could be still a binutils issue (without seeing
sparc
> Automatic build of beav_1:1.40-18 on bilbao by sbuild/sparc 85
...
> gcc -O2 -g -Wall -DUNIX -DNOPROTO -c -o main.o main.c
> main.c: In function 'main':
> main.c:119: warning: implicit declaration of function 'init_fmt'
> main.c:120: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strcpy'
> m
more sparc:
> Automatic build of scansort_1.81-2 on bilbao by sbuild/sparc 85
...
> gcc -O2 -Wall -c csv.c
> csv.c: In function 'hash_name':
> csv.c:72: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of
> 'make_search_string' differ in signedness
> csv.c:73: warning: pointer targets in passing
sparc
> Automatic build of tn5250_0.16.5-12 on bilbao by sbuild/sparc 85
...
> cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\" -g -Wall -O2 -c
> display.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/display.o
> display.c: In function 'tn5250_display_kf_field_exit':
> display.c:1101: warning: unused variable 'l'
--- Comment #10 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-04-18 14:39 ---
It's probably two different bugs, since the 4.1 bug is in loop.c. We need to
add a can_assign_to_reg_p call before creating a movable.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27158
--- You are receiving th
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-04-18 14:29 ---
The mem is for a
(const_vector:V4SF [
(const_double:SF -NaN [-NaN])
(const_double:SF -NaN [-NaN])
(const_double:SF -NaN [-NaN])
(const_double:SF -NaN [-NaN])
])
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/18/2006 10:37:54 AM:
> OK, good news. Most failures are gone with 4.2.0 20060415.
>
> There are still two failures:
>
> perlipq_1.25-1
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/../lib64/libipq.a(libipq.o): relocation
> R_X86_64_32 against
> `a local symbol' canno
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-17 15:26]:
> Can you guys try a GCC 4.2 that is after 2006-04-05 as there was an
> couple of bugs filed about some hidden vs anonymous namespaces
> issues that was worked around in the new version of the compiler.
OK, good news. Most failures are gone with 4.2.0 200
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 362414 libsndfile
Bug#362414: abs() returns a negative number
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-snapshot' to `libsndfile'.
> retitle 362414 lossy_comp_test fails because signed types are undefined on
> overflow
Bug#362414: abs() returns a nega
reassign 362414 libsndfile
retitle 362414 lossy_comp_test fails because signed types are undefined on
overflow
tags 362414 + patch
thanks
* Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-18 18:05]:
> > * Petr Salinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-14 13:05]:
> >> Does help to compile it with "-fwrapv"
--- Comment #8 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-04-18 13:47 ---
Seems similar to PR24230, but cannot be fixed really in the same way.
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> reassign 360906 gij-4.0
Bug#360906: libhsqldb-java: should depend on java-runtime?
Bug reassigned from package `libhsqldb-java' to `gij-4.0'.
> retitle 360906 provide java2-runtime
B
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Petr Salinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-14 13:05]:
>> Does help to compile it with "-fwrapv" ?
>
> No.
Are you sure? It does for me.
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.0-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
--- gcc-4.1-4.1.0/debian/control.m4 2006-04-04 12:50:12.0 +0200
+++ gcc-4.1-4.1.0-1/debian/control.m4 2006-04-17 22:41:54.0 +0200
@@ -111,6 +111,8 @@
Section: ifdef(`TARGET',`devel',`libs')
Priority: ifdef(`TARGE
Tired of working a dead end job ?
Ca.ll u_s now get any de.g.ree you desire in 2weeks! _1.0.0% verifiable
1+206-337-1883
Bye,
Daren Adams
gliding, venomous creatures, with their deadly eyes and wicked, .
"People's perce
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-17 15:26]:
> Can you guys try a GCC 4.2 that is after 2006-04-05 as there was an
> couple of bugs filed about some hidden vs anonymous namespaces
> issues that was worked around in the new version of the compiler.
20060408 didn't work but it seems 20060415 works, at
Hello,
* Matthias Klose [Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:51:35AM +0200]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Can you guys try a GCC 4.2 that is after 2006-04-05 as there was an couple
> > of bugs filed about some
> > hidden vs anonymous namespaces issues that was worked around in the new
> > version of the
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:45:53 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359699: gcc-4.0: Can't compile 32-bit on amd64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
30 matches
Mail list logo
