On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 04:10:32PM +0100, Christian E. Boehme wrote:
> The actual problem, however, lies in the path resolution algorithm for
> standard headers. For whatever reason, the frontend
> (/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/cc1plus) looks for headers under
> /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_3_4_6_release revision 111785
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: abi_check
XPASS: 22_locale/locale/cons/12658_thread.cc execution test
XPASS: 26_numerics/c99_classification_m
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_1_0_release revision 111560
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2316
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
* Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-22 17:49]:
> > Matthias, can libffi please recognize mips64. This is not an issue for
> > our buildds but it would be nice if it would get fixed anyway.
>
> I think the above error is correct if you are compiling on a 64bit
> kernel without linux32 (i.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 09:41:01PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: libffi4
> Severity: wishlist
>
> > Automatic build of pnet_0.7.4-1 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.106
> ...
> > checking whether mmap with MAP_ANON(YMOUS) works... yes
> > configure: error: "libffi has not been ported to mips
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 08:15:07PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Please don't drop the BTS from the recipient list when replying.
Your Return-Path contains only <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> which I assume
mutt prefers over the From header ...
> So, as I said, this is completely unreproducible here. You
6 matches
Mail list logo
