[Bug middle-end/24221] ICE in first_insn_after_basic_block_note on HPPA

--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-19 05:01 --- No feedback in 3 months. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Bug#357661: libgcc1 fails to provide -dcv1 when cross-compiling

Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.2-9.my Severity: minor Tags: patch --- gcc-4.0-4.0.2/debian/control.m4 2006-03-17 12:25:13.0 +0100 +++ gcc-4.0-4.0.2-9/debian/control.m4 2006-03-17 12:20:46.0 +0100 @@ -103,6 +103,8 @@ Section: ifdef(`TARGET',`devel',`libs') Priority: ifdef(`T

Bug#357658: libgcc1 does not provide -dcv1 when cross-compiling

Package: gcc-3.4 Version: 3.4.5-2 Severity: minor Tags: patch --- gcc-3.4-3.4.5/debian/control.m4 2006-03-17 23:15:24.0 +0100 +++ gcc-3.4-3.4.5-2/debian/control.m4 2006-03-17 23:17:19.0 +0100 @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ Section: ifdef(`TARGET',`devel',`libs') Priority: ifdef(`TARGET

Bug#357629: libgcc1 does not provide -dcv1 when cross-compiling

Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.6-10 Severity: minor Tags: patch --- gcc-3.3-3.3.6/debian/control.m4 2006-03-17 23:15:07.0 +0100 +++ gcc-3.3-3.3.6-10/debian/control.m4 2006-03-17 23:23:08.0 +0100 @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ Section: ifdef(`TARGET',`devel',`libs') Priority: ifdef(`TARG

gcc-3.3_3.3.6-13_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.6-13_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.6-13_all.deb cpp-3.3_3.3.6-13_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.6-13_i386.deb g++-3.3_3.3.6-13_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/g++-3.3_3.3.6-13_i386.deb gcc-3.3-base_3.3.6-13_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc

Bug#356898: marked as done (gcc-3.3: Cleanup duplicate control fields)

Your message dated Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:32:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356898: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.6-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#339934: marked as done (gcc-3.3: does not honour -fPIC on GNU/kFreeBSD)

Your message dated Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:32:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339934: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.6-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#331220: marked as done (gcc-3.3: Please add big-endian arm (armeb) support)

Your message dated Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:32:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331220: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.6-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processing of gcc-3.3_3.3.6-13_i386.changes

gcc-3.3_3.3.6-13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.3_3.3.6-13.dsc gcc-3.3_3.3.6-13.diff.gz cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.6-13_all.deb libstdc++5-3.3-doc_3.3.6-13_all.deb gcc-3.3-doc_3.3.6-13_all.deb gcc-3.3-base_3.3.6-13_i386.deb cpp-3.3_3.3.6-13_i386.deb

Bug#270340: marked as done ([PR 18592] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand)

Your message dated Sat, 18 Mar 2006 14:06:45 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [Bug target/18592] [3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Processed: gcc tagging

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 247112 + fixed-upstream Bug#247112: [PR 6634] long long double should be rejected Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > retitle 247112 [PR 6634, fixed in 4.2] wrong parsing of "long long double" Bug#247112: [PR 6634] long long double sh