> After a discussion on IRC, it seems there is no consensus about how
> multiarch should be done. Therefore I stop working on that (patches are
> still welcome for glibc).
Is this really the best thing to do?
Even though there is no consensus (I overread the thread and anyway
most parts of it
Bdale Garbee writes:
> On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 01:12 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > The only change planned is to make libc6-dev-i386 and libc6-i386 provide
> > a glibc on amd64 instead of ia32-libs. It will be in /emul/ia32-linux (I
> > still have to find how to do that cleanly in the debhelp
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 01:12 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The only change planned is to make libc6-dev-i386 and libc6-i386 provide
> a glibc on amd64 instead of ia32-libs. It will be in /emul/ia32-linux (I
> still have to find how to do that cleanly in the debhelper files).
>
> Bdale, do you a
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:25
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:58:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Some update on this, as we have evolved a lot since the last mail.
Bdale Garbee a écrit :
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 07:10 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Moving 32-bit libraries to (/usr)/lib32 won't mak
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:58:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Some update on this, as we have evolved a lot since the last mail.
> Bdale Garbee a écrit :
> >On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 07:10 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Moving 32-bit libraries to (/usr)/lib32 won't make the amd64 port
FYI: The status of the gcc-4.0 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4.0.2-8
Current version: 4.0.2-9
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
Hi!
Some update on this, as we have evolved a lot since the last mail.
Bdale Garbee a écrit :
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 07:10 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Moving 32-bit libraries to (/usr)/lib32 won't make the amd64 port
compliant with the FHS, which is almost impossible given the current
setup
9 matches
Mail list logo