Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
If there's
consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
/emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
My se
Accepted:
cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp9_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp9_hppa.deb
fastjar_4.1-0exp9_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fastjar_4.1-0exp9_hppa.deb
fixincludes_4.1-0exp9_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fixincludes_4.1-0exp9_hppa.deb
g++-4.1_4.1-0exp9_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g
gcc-4.1_4.1-0exp9_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.1-base_4.1-0exp9_hppa.deb
libgcc4_4.1-0exp9_hppa.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp9_hppa.deb
protoize_4.1-0exp9_hppa.deb
fixincludes_4.1-0exp9_hppa.deb
libmudflap0_4.1-0exp9_hppa.deb
libmudflap0-dev_4.1-0
The GCC (GNU compiler collection) 4.1 release candidate 1 can be found
in experimental. "Porters", please make sure that the package is
built and uploaded (if it's not built by the experimental
buildd). Please check that the symbols exported in the 4.1 libraries
are a superset of those exported in
expected failures 69
# of unsupported tests 93
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes22900
# of expected failures 138
# of unsupported tests 172
/home/doko/gcc/4.0/gcc-4.0-4.0.2/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 4.0.3
20060220
passes34250
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 207
# of unsupported tests 209
/home/packages/gcc/4.0/gcc-4.0-4.0.2/build/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 4.0.3
20060220 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-10)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > If there's
> > consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
> > /emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
> My sense is that the "c
Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
If there's
consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
/emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
My sense i
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> In the end, I'd like to get rid of ia32-libs, and have it be a
> dummy package. But on the other hand, I don't want to make a
> biarch version of things like the X libraries.
you can't get rid of it on ia64 unless you either drop the 32bit
support or else you provide a cross
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > If there's
> > consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
> > /emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
>
> My sense is that the
Hi,
I've got a PC with Windows XP, with a NTFS hard
disk. Like before, I made a Linux ext2 partition where I installed Debian (
along with a swap linux partition).
The problem is that when I tryed to run a program
in Debian that would write to the disk, I found out that I only had read-only
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 353346 important
Bug#353346: gcj can't make shared libs on hppa.
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gcc-4.1-base_4.1-0exp9_i386.deb: package says section is libs, override says
devel.
gcc-4.1-base_4.1-0exp9_ia64.deb: package says section is libs, override says
devel.
gcc-4.1-base_4.1-0e
Accepted:
cpp-4.1-doc_4.1-0exp9_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1-doc_4.1-0exp9_all.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp9_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp9_i386.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp9_ia64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp9_ia64.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp9_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/
gcc-4.1_4.1ds9-0exp9_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.1_4.1ds9.orig.tar.gz
libgcj7_4.1-0exp9_i386.deb
fastjar_4.1-0exp9_powerpc.deb
libmudflap0-dev_4.1-0exp9_i386.deb
fastjar_4.1-0exp9_i386.deb
libgcj7-dev_4.1-0exp9_ia64.deb
lib64ffi4_4.1-0e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 353346 gcj-4.0
Bug#353346: libtool_1.9+20051221-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: segv in test
Bug reassigned from package `libtool' to `gcj-4.0'.
> retitle 353346 gcj can't make shared libs on hppa.
Bug#353346: libtool_1.9+20051221-1(hppa/experime
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> If there's
> consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
> /emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
My sense is that the "concensus" that exists is around FHS compliance.
While I personally consi
Package: libg2c0-dev
Version: 1:3.3.5-13
Severity: important
Hi!
Debian sarge contains an amd64 kernel and the gcc-3.4 suite including
g77-3.4, which depends on libg2c0-dev.
Unfortunately, libg2c0 and libg2c0-dev do not contain any 64bit
libraries, so trying to compile a 64bit Fortran library fa
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20060218-2_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20060218-2_hppa.deb
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-snapshot_20060218-2_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20060218-2_hppa.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:19:37AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please recheck with a current gcc-4.1 from experimental.
Looks like gcc-4.1_4.1-0exp4 is fine.
| (sid-exp)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc-4.1 -O -g -fomit-frame-pointer
| libc-bug.c
| /usr/lib/gcc/m68k-linux-gnu/4.1.0/../../../crt1.o: In
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:25:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337263: gij-4.0: segfaults on arm
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
> > These patches seem to fix this problem. I haven't tested the resulting
> > gij very extensively, but it can at least execute "hello world" type
> > stuff now.
>
> thanks, committed to the debian svn archives (4.0 and and 4.1). Do you
> forward these upstream?
>
> Andreas, please can you chec
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The amd64 port is currently providing 32-bit libraries via the ia32-libs
> package. This package was originally designed for ia64, and thus install
> 32-bit libraries in /emul/ia32-linux/ . This is not compliant with the
> FHS for a
24 matches
Mail list logo
