--- Comment #11 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 06:50 ---
If nobody is going to fix gcse2, the right thing to do is to not set
flag_gcse_after_reload for optimize >= 3 in opts.c:
Index: opts.c
===
--- opts.c
--- Comment #27 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 06:42 ---
accept while testing a patch...
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-05-08 17:32:57 |2005-12-15 04:50:22
date||
--- Comment #26 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 00:54 ---
Needless to say really, but the patchlet in comment #25 is inverted...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23837
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watc
--- Comment #25 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 00:52 ---
Smarter folks than me (iant ;-) suggest that "a multi-word rotate will normally
need all the input bits when setting any of the output bits", so the entire
no-conflict thing doesn't make sense here.
So, let's not do
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Dec 10 15:45:24 UTC 2005 (revision 108350)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c32001e
FAIL: c52103x
FAIL: c52104x
FAIL: c52104y
FAIL: c64105b
FAIL: c95086b
FAIL: ce3810b
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2312
# of unexpect
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Dec 10 15:45:24 UTC 2005 (revision 108350)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c32001e
FAIL: c34007p
FAIL: c34007r
FAIL: c37010a
FAIL: c41104a
FAIL: c45281a
FAIL: c47002c
FAIL: c48006b
FAIL: c52103x
FAIL: c62003a
FAIL: c62003b
FAIL: c64103e
FAIL: c
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Dec 10 15:45:24 UTC 2005 (revision 108350)
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes228
# of unsupported tests 2
==
--- Comment #24 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 00:09 ---
I think we can blame combine for this bug.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #23 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 00:00 ---
lreg decides to do this:
;; Register 95 in 25.
;; Register 97 in 28.
;; Register 99 in 22.
;; Register 102 in 21.
;; Register 104 in 25.
;; Register 111 in 28.
;; Register 112 in 19.
;; Register 113 in 28.
and reloa
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-12-14 23:09 ---
Ok, thanks. Seems a long standing but rather simple issue.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-14 22:02 ---
This worked in 3.3.x so this is a regression.
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
By the way using
new cvt_byname_t(name,1)
instead of
new cvt_byname_t(name)
does not change anything.
Looks sensible since the suggested "double delete" explanation is a
"locale" double delete, not a "facet" double delete.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
[I haven't cc'd debian-release@lists.debian.org or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:48:50PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I think it's wrong to add conflicts to libstdc++6. we'll end up with
> an unmanagable long list of conflicts. can the conflict be added to
> some basic gtk package
I think it's wrong to add conflicts to libstdc++6. we'll end up with
an unmanagable long list of conflicts. can the conflict be added to
some basic gtk package instead?
Peter Moulder writes:
> Package: libstdc++6
> Version: 4.0.2-5
> Severity: important
>
>
> Upgrading libstdc++6 from 4.0.2-2 to
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:06:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [PR 24572] [4.0 regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at
gimplify.c:3983
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Package: libstdc++6
Version: 4.0.2-5
Severity: important
Upgrading libstdc++6 from 4.0.2-2 to 4.0.2-5 causes crashes in various
gtk programs when GTK_IM_MODULE=scim is in the environment.
I have the following scim-related packages:
ii scim 1.0.2-3Smart Common Input Me
17 matches
Mail list logo
