Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Sorry for the spam, maintainer.
> submitter 266140 !
Bug#266140: typo in kdmrc (in LogoPixmap option)
Changed Bug submitter from Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Adeodato Simó
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 272913 !
Bug#272913: would I be nu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 323133
Bug#323133: [PR 21123, 4.0 regression, fixed in 4.1] ICE on arm & m68k when
compiling arts (in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101)
Bug#323686: [PR 21123] ICE in cp_expr_size, compiling orbit2cpp in unstable
Bug#335286: gcc: Internal
Accepted:
java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.44-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.44-1_i386.deb
java-gcj-compat_1.0.44-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.0.44-1.diff.gz
java-gcj-compat_1.0.44-1.dsc
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.
Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:02:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336728: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.44-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:02:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335479: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.44-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:02:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328743: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.44-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:02:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315646: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.44-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
java-gcj-compat_1.0.44-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
java-gcj-compat_1.0.44-1.dsc
java-gcj-compat_1.0.44.orig.tar.gz
java-gcj-compat_1.0.44-1.diff.gz
java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.44-1_i386.deb
java-gcj-compat_1.0.44-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your
Package: gij-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-4
Severity: normal
Hi,
$ gij-4.0 test
Segmentation fault
$ cat test.java
public class test
{
public test()
{
test t = new test();
}
public static void main(String argv[])
{
new test();
}
}
Bye, Jörg.
-- System Informa
--- Comment #40 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-24 20:21 ---
it also builds on i486. unfortunately amd64 fails on a-except even with -O0.
(...)
stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/x86_64-pld-linux/bin/ -c -march=x86-64 -O2 -ggdb
-gnatpg -gnata -g -O0 \
-I- -I. -Iada -I../../gcc/ada ..
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:36:14AM +0100, Pawe? Machnikowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Maxima in my work and I now also need to install the gfortran-4.0
> package (testing). But the former works only with libgmp3, while the latter
> only with libgmp3c2 (it sais "libgmp3c2 | libgmp3c2", which l
--- Comment #39 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-11-24 14:46 ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> > That doesn't cover the Ada tools. They build for me at -O0 on PowerPC so
> > with
> > Andrew's FE patch + a possible tweak in the Makefile, you should have an Ada
> > compiler.
>
> They even
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 315646
Bug#315646: java-gcj-compat: last upload of gcc-4.0 broke links in include
directory
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
--- Comment #38 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-24 11:14
---
> That doesn't cover the Ada tools. They build for me at -O0 on PowerPC so with
> Andrew's FE patch + a possible tweak in the Makefile, you should have an Ada
> compiler.
They even build for me at -O2 on PowerP
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20051122-1_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20051122-1_hppa.deb
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-snapshot_20051122-1_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20051122-1_hppa.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Followup-For: Bug #315646
Seems that the symlinks don't point to 4.0.1 anymore but to
4.0.2. However, I think they should actually point to 4.0.3 since no
debian package includes "4.0.2/include/jawt.h" according to
packages.debian.org
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.0-1
Hi,
I'm using Maxima in my work and I now also need to install the gfortran-4.0
package (testing). But the former works only with libgmp3, while the latter
only with libgmp3c2 (it sais "libgmp3c2 | libgmp3c2", which looks strange).
Is it a bug or just an effect of using the stable distribution
18 matches
Mail list logo
