Processed: tag gcc report

2005-11-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 329135 gcc-4.1 Bug#329135: [PR target/23602] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in libjava, when configured for i486-linux Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `gcc-4.1'. > tags 329135 + fixed-upstream Bug#329135: [PR target/23602] [4.1 regr

Bug#339703: gcc-2.95: ftbfs [sparc] 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/obstack.h.r

2005-11-17 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: gcc-2.95 Version: 1:2.95.4-23 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source gcc-2.95 failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. if [ -x debian/patches/sparc-gcc4-fix.dpatch ]; then true; else chmod +x debian/patches/sparc-gcc4-fix.dpatch; fi if

[Bug target/24348] [4.1 regression] bootstrap failure building libgcc

2005-11-17 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 03:22 --- Subject: Bug 24348 Author: danglin Date: Fri Nov 18 03:22:18 2005 New Revision: 107157 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107157 Log: PR target/24348 * config.gcc (hppa*-*-hpux*):

Results for 4.0.3 20051111 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-4) testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

2005-11-17 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Nov 11 23:10:32 UTC 2005 (revision 106803) === acats tests === === acats Summary === # of expected passes2320 # of unexpected failures0 Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running tar

Results for 4.0.3 20051111 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-4) testsuite on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu

2005-11-17 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Nov 11 23:10:32 UTC 2005 (revision 106803) === acats tests === FAIL: c36204d FAIL: c9a009a FAIL: c9a009c FAIL: c9a009h FAIL: c9a010a FAIL: cb4009a FAIL: cd5014e === acats Summary === # of expected passes2313 # of unexpect

Results for 3.4.5 20051112 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.4-10) testsuite on mipsel-linux-gnu

2005-11-17 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Nov 12 13:57:02 UTC 2005 (revision 106823) Native configuration is mipsel-linux-gnu (rem) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: fjf998r.pas === gpc Summary === # of tests4947 # of expected passes 4943 # of unexpected

Results for 3.4.5 20051112 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.4-10) testsuite on s390-linux-gnu

2005-11-17 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Nov 12 13:57:02 UTC 2005 (revision 106823) Native configuration is s390-linux-gnu (debian-31) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: fjf998r.pas === gpc Summary === # of tests4947 # of expected passes 4943 # of unexpec

Results for 3.4.5 20051112 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.4-10) testsuite on mips-linux-gnu

2005-11-17 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Nov 12 13:57:02 UTC 2005 (revision 106823) Native configuration is mips-linux-gnu (ball) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: bo4-19.pas FAIL: emptyrec.pas FAIL: fjf519a.pas FAIL: fjf519b.pas FAIL: fjf519c.pas FAIL: fjf519d.pas FAIL: fjf519e.pas FAIL: fjf

Results for 3.4.5 20051112 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.4-10) testsuite on ia64-linux-gnu

2005-11-17 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Nov 12 13:57:02 UTC 2005 (revision 106823) Native configuration is ia64-linux-gnu (caballero) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: chief40.pas FAIL: chuck6.pas FAIL: fieldw.pas FAIL: fjf219e.pas FAIL: fjf219f.pas FAIL: fjf23.pas FAIL: fjf30b.pas FAIL: fjf

Results for 3.4.5 20051112 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.4-10) testsuite on hppa-linux-gnu

2005-11-17 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Nov 12 13:57:02 UTC 2005 (revision 106823) Native configuration is hppa-linux-gnu (sarti) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: avo2a.pas FAIL: avo2b.pas FAIL: russ3b.pas === gpc Summary === # of tests4947 # of expected pa

Results for 3.4.5 20051112 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.4-10) testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

2005-11-17 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Nov 12 13:57:02 UTC 2005 (revision 106823) Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu === libstdc++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: 22_locale/locale/cons/12658_thread.cc execution test XPASS: 26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess

gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_m68k.changes ACCEPTED

2005-11-17 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_m68k.deb fastjar_4.0.2-4_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-4_m68k.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-4_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-4_m68k.deb g++-4.0_4.0.2-4_m68k.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/g++-4

Processing of gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_m68k.changes

2005-11-17 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-4_m68k.deb libgcc2_4.0.2-4_m68k.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_m68k.deb protoize_4.0.2-4_m68k.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-4_m68k.deb libmudflap0_4.0.2-4_m68k.deb libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-4_m68k.deb

[Bug c/24916] option -O undocumented in cpp docs

2005-11-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 18:34 --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > the point of the bug submitter was to have them documented in cpp(1). > But they are documented in the info page: I should point out the web page is generated

[Bug c/24916] option -O undocumented in cpp docs

2005-11-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 18:33 --- (In reply to comment #5) > the point of the bug submitter was to have them documented in cpp(1). But they are documented in the info page: Predefined Macros * Standard Predefined Macros:: * Common Predefined Macros

[Bug c/24916] option -O undocumented in cpp docs

2005-11-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 18:05 --- And have been since 3.1: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.1/cpp/Common-Predefined-Macros.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24916 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You rep

[Bug c/24916] option -O undocumented in cpp docs

2005-11-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 18:04 --- Since they are documented, I am going to close this as invalid. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c/24916] option -O undocumented in cpp docs

2005-11-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 18:03 --- They are documented: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Common-Predefined-Macros.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24916 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You reported the bu

[Bug c/24916] option -O undocumented in cpp docs

2005-11-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 18:02 --- The C front-end defines these. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: libstdc++ configuratrion

2005-11-17 Thread Damyan Ivanov
2005/11/17, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > sorry for being a bit unclear. These *mt_alloc* symbols are exactly > these we are looking for, so at least the package has to be > rebuilt. Understood. Thanks for clarifying this. > AFAICS no bug asking for a package renaming has been filed. I s

Re: libstdc++ configuratrion

2005-11-17 Thread Matthias Klose
sorry for being a bit unclear. These *mt_alloc* symbols are exactly these we are looking for, so at least the package has to be rebuilt. AFAICS no bug asking for a package renaming has been filed. Matthias Damyan Ivanov writes: > 2005/11/11, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > there are cur

Re: libstdc++ configuratrion

2005-11-17 Thread Damyan Ivanov
2005/11/11, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > there are currently about 1700 binary packages depending on > libstdc++6, 150 library source packages and 182 app source packages > have references to mt_alloc symbols. I see firebird2 in your list. How did it get there? I've run objdump -t agains