[Bug ada/22533] [4.1 regression] Ada ICE during bootstrap on many platforms

--- Comment #30 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 01:08 --- With that patch applied, Ada bootstraps on s390-ibm-linux and s390x-ibm-linux. Regression test results are at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-11/msg00831.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/20

Bug#197674: Hey there *kiss*

Hi baby XOXO. it's me. I'm pretty sure you dont know me, because well, we've never even met. eheh Nevertheless, the matchmaking service has told me that you and ME! would be the perfect match. Well if you think you're interested why dont you check out my pictures and stuff? My screename is hotti

gcc-3.4_3.4.4-10_sparc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.4_3.4.4-10_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.4-10_sparc.deb g++-3.4_3.4.4-10_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g++-3.4_3.4.4-10_sparc.deb g77-3.4_3.4.4-10_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g77-3.4_3.4.4-10_sparc.deb gcc-3.4-base_3.4.4-10_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gc

gcc-3.4_3.4.4-10_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.4_3.4.4-10_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.4-10_powerpc.deb g++-3.4_3.4.4-10_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g++-3.4_3.4.4-10_powerpc.deb g77-3.4_3.4.4-10_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g77-3.4_3.4.4-10_powerpc.deb gcc-3.4-base_3.4.4-10_powerpc.deb to

Processing of gcc-3.4_3.4.4-10_powerpc.changes

gcc-3.4_3.4.4-10_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.4-base_3.4.4-10_powerpc.deb cpp-3.4_3.4.4-10_powerpc.deb gobjc-3.4_3.4.4-10_powerpc.deb g++-3.4_3.4.4-10_powerpc.deb libstdc++6-dev_3.4.4-10_powerpc.deb libstdc++6-pic_3.4.4-10_powerpc.deb

Processing of gcc-3.4_3.4.4-10_sparc.changes

gcc-3.4_3.4.4-10_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.4-base_3.4.4-10_sparc.deb cpp-3.4_3.4.4-10_sparc.deb gobjc-3.4_3.4.4-10_sparc.deb g++-3.4_3.4.4-10_sparc.deb libstdc++6-dev_3.4.4-10_sparc.deb libstdc++6-pic_3.4.4-10_sparc.deb libstdc++6-dbg

gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_hppa.deb fastjar_4.0.2-4_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-4_hppa.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-4_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-4_hppa.deb g++-4.0_4.0.2-4_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/g++-4

gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_sparc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_sparc.deb fastjar_4.0.2-4_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-4_sparc.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-4_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-4_sparc.deb g++-4.0_4.0.2-4_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.

gcc-3.4_3.4.4-10_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.4-10_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.4-10_all.deb cpp-3.4_3.4.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.4-10_i386.deb g++-3.4_3.4.4-10_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g++-3.4_3.4.4-10_i386.deb g77-3.4-doc_3.4.4-10_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3

gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_powerpc.deb fastjar_4.0.2-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-4_powerpc.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-4_powerpc.deb g++-4.0_4.0.2-4_powerpc.deb to pool

gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_alpha.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_alpha.deb fastjar_4.0.2-4_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-4_alpha.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-4_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.0.2-4_alpha.deb g++-4.0_4.0.2-4_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.

Processing of gcc-3.4_3.4.4-10_i386.changes

gcc-3.4_3.4.4-10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.4_3.4.4-10.dsc gcc-3.4_3.4.4-10.diff.gz cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.4-10_all.deb libstdc++6-doc_3.4.4-10_all.deb g77-3.4-doc_3.4.4-10_all.deb gnat-3.4-doc_3.4.4-10_all.deb gpc-2.1-3.4-doc_3.4.4-10_all.deb

gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-4_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-4_all.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_i386.deb fastjar_4.0.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.2-4_i386.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fix

Processing of gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_hppa.changes

gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-4_hppa.deb libgcc2_4.0.2-4_hppa.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_hppa.deb protoize_4.0.2-4_hppa.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-4_hppa.deb libmudflap0_4.0.2-4_hppa.deb libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-4_hppa.deb

Processing of gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_powerpc.changes

gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-4_powerpc.deb libgcc1_4.0.2-4_powerpc.deb lib64gcc1_4.0.2-4_powerpc.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_powerpc.deb protoize_4.0.2-4_powerpc.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-4_powerpc.deb libmudflap0_4.0.

Processing of gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_sparc.changes

gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-4_sparc.deb libgcc1_4.0.2-4_sparc.deb lib64gcc1_4.0.2-4_sparc.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_sparc.deb protoize_4.0.2-4_sparc.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-4_sparc.deb libmudflap0_4.0.2-4_sparc.deb

Processing of gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_alpha.changes

gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.0-base_4.0.2-4_alpha.deb libgcc1_4.0.2-4_alpha.deb cpp-4.0_4.0.2-4_alpha.deb protoize_4.0.2-4_alpha.deb fixincludes_4.0.2-4_alpha.deb libmudflap0_4.0.2-4_alpha.deb libmudflap0-dev_4.0.2-4_alph

Bug#336167: marked as done (gcc-4.0: breaks kernel builds in random ways.)

Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:32:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336463: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#336463: marked as done (Floating point exception ICE on mips and mipsel)

Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:32:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336463: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#336114: marked as done (gcc-4.0_4.0.1-9 backwards incompatible changes)

Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:32:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336114: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#333100: marked as done ([PR 21123] [4.0 regression] [hppa] Fails to build kdebluetooth)

Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:32:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333100: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#335286: marked as done (gcc: Internal error compiling lilypond on hppa,arm)

Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:32:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323133: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#325050: marked as done ([PR 23567] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] if-conversion causes wrong code)

Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:32:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325050: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#323133: marked as done ([PR 21123, 4.0 regression, fixed in 4.1] ICE on arm & m68k when compiling arts (in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101))

Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:32:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323133: fixed in gcc-4.0 4.0.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processing of gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_i386.changes

gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4.dsc gcc-4.0_4.0.2-4.diff.gz cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.2-4_all.deb libgcj6-common_4.0.2-4_all.deb libgcj-common_4.0.2-4_all.deb libgcj6-src_4.0.2-4_all.deb libstdc++6-4.0-doc_4.0.2-4_all.deb g

Bug#339495: cpp-4.0-doc: cpp support "-O" option but not documented

Package: cpp-4.0-doc Version: 4.0.2-3 Severity: minor Hello, you can see[1] that cpp support -O, -O[1-9], -Os options, and these options are meanful. but this is not documented in man page[2] and info[3]. man page belongs to cpp-4.0, need I clone this bug? [1] $ cpp -dM /dev/null | grep OPT $ c

Re:詳細になります

先程、あなた様へ近隣在住女性より指名が入りました。詳細になります。 名前：和田美香子（28） タイトル：今日は一日空いてます。 メッセージ： 今から会える人ですか？車はあるから帰りの心配はいりませんよ。 私と一晩付き合ってくれますか？ http://www.luv2006.tv/?hs0511 完全無料登録です。サイト内(登録、メールのやり取りすべての利用, 検索〜出会いまで自由解放しております。) ※直電話機能をご用意致しましたのでご利用下さい。 これは貴方様限定のお知らせですので他者には絶対に教えないで下さい！ 不法な請求は一切ございません。 拒否の場合は下記へ [EMAIL

[Bug ada/22533] [4.1 regression] Ada ICE during bootstrap on many platforms

--- Comment #29 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 17:27 --- > So I guess it would be possible right now to fix the bootstrap issue > by a pure front-end patch. (This doesn't address the more general > question of whether or not the gimplifier has a bug that can be expos

gcc-4.1_4.1ds0-0exp0_sparc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp0_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp0_sparc.deb fastjar_4.1-0exp0_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fastjar_4.1-0exp0_sparc.deb fixincludes_4.1-0exp0_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fixincludes_4.1-0exp0_sparc.deb g++-4.1_4.1-0exp0_sparc.deb to pool

Processing of gcc-4.1_4.1ds0-0exp0_sparc.changes

gcc-4.1_4.1ds0-0exp0_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.1-base_4.1-0exp0_sparc.deb libgcc1_4.1-0exp0_sparc.deb lib64gcc1_4.1-0exp0_sparc.deb cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp0_sparc.deb protoize_4.1-0exp0_sparc.deb fixincludes_4.1-0exp0_sparc.deb libmudflap0_4

GAS help needed for #335881 -- forcing x86 instruction length

A recent GAS update changed the length of this instruction: adc 0(%ebx,%ecx,4),%edx Previously, it was encoded as a four-octet sequence, now it's equivalent to: adc (%ebx,%ecx,4),%edx -- which only needs three octets. Is there a way to force the old behavior, without inserting nops? (If n

[Bug target/24348] [4.1 regression] bootstrap failure building libgcc

--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 14:16 --- Affects hpux as well as linux. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added GCC

[Bug c++/23797] [3.4 Regression] ICE on typename outside template

--- Comment #17 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 13:05 --- Now also fixed on the 3.4 branch. -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/23797] [3.4 Regression] ICE on typename outside template

--- Comment #16 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 13:03 --- Subject: Bug 23797 Author: reichelt Date: Wed Nov 16 13:03:13 2005 New Revision: 107081 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107081 Log: Backport from mainline: 2005-10-12 Natha

Bug#336022: marked as done (gcc-2.95: kernel 2.4.31 won't compile)

Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:15:49 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336022: this is actually binutils bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#336022: this is actually binutils bug

On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 01:30:39PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > I've seen such an error too. I don't think this is gcc-2.95 bug, since > > gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4 fail with the same error message. > > This is binutils (version 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 and newer) bug (feature?). > > With binutils from tes

Bug#336022: this is actually binutils bug

Sheplyakov Alexei wrote: > Hello! > > On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:12:54 +0200, Stefan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > make bzImage CC=gcc-2.95 > > .. > > make CFLAGS="-D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.31/include -Wall > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-alias > > make[1]:

Bug#336022: this is actually binutils bug

Hello! On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:12:54 +0200, Stefan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > make bzImage CC=gcc-2.95 > .. > make CFLAGS="-D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.31/include -Wall > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-alias > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.31/a

Re: Bug#234711: ICE in final.c:2117 when compiling a huge source file

Hi,   I found a way to eliminate the problem.  (error: array bound forbidden after parenthesized type-id note: try removing the parentheses around the type-id)   I'm using gcc version 3.4.3 (Red Hat 3.4.3-22.1) for my development. I also experienced this error when I'm trying to co