--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-05-04 02:11:44 |2005-11-02 01:48:57
date||
--- Comment #13 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 23:51 ---
I believe the problem originated here:
2003-07-29 Neil Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR preprocessor/11569
PR preprocessor/11649
* Makefile.in (LIBCPP_DEPS): Add HASHTAB_H.
* cppfiles.c
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 22:46 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 22:00
---
Seems to happen a lot on hppa-linux here. 19 packages fail to build due to
this. Do you need another testcase?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Adde
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-3
Severity: normal
When I compile the following program like this:
gcc -Wall t2.cpp
I get this warning:
t2.cpp: In function 'int x(T)':
t2.cpp:11: warning: statement has no effect
t2.cpp: In function 'int x3(T)':
t2.cpp:25: warning: statement has no effect
When
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 336511 [PR libmudflap/24619] mudflap instrumentation of dlopen is
> incorrect
Bug#336511: gcc-snapshot: mudflap instrumentation of dlopen is incorrect
Changed Bug title.
> forwarded 336511 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24619
Bug#336511: [PR libmudflap/
Your message dated Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:59:48 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335563: gcc-4.0: manpage escape problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 17:48 ---
I think this is a GNU extension or one which came in from elf.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24619
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:33:35PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Package: gcc-4.0
> > > Version: 4.0.2-3
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Justification: renders package unusable
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, i confirm that this problem is also present on pow
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Package: gcc-4.0
> > Version: 4.0.2-3
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> >
> > Well, i confirm that this problem is also present on powerpc, using
> > gcc-4.0 4.0.2-3 makes the kernel build fail, while using -2 seems
10 matches
Mail list logo