Al-Manahel Newsletter List Unsubscription

2005-10-26 Thread munir
The removal of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Date of this removal: Wed Oct 26 18:59:17 2005 Please save this email message for future reference. --

Welcome to Al-Manahel Newsletter List

2005-10-26 Thread munir
The subscription of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Thanks for subscribing! Date of this subscription: Wed Oct 26 17:39:31 2005 Please save this email message for future reference. -

Processed: Re: Bug#335910: gcc-4.0: FTBFS on amd64: lib32z1 conflict with ia32-libs

2005-10-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 335910 ia32-libs Bug#335910: gcc-4.0: FTBFS on amd64: lib32z1 conflict with ia32-libs Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `ia32-libs'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Bug#335910: gcc-4.0: FTBFS on amd64: lib32z1 conflict with ia32-libs

2005-10-26 Thread Matthias Klose
reassign 335910 ia32-libs thanks Kurt Roeckx writes: > Package: gcc-4.0 > Version: 4.0.2-3 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > Your package is failing to install because it seems to have added > a depedency on lib32z1-dev [amd64], and it it has conflicting > files with the version in ia32-libs. >

Bug#335910: gcc-4.0: FTBFS on amd64: lib32z1 conflict with ia32-libs

2005-10-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.2-3 Severity: important Hi, Your package is failing to install because it seems to have added a depedency on lib32z1-dev [amd64], and it it has conflicting files with the version in ia32-libs. You have: libc6-dev-i386 [amd64] | ia32-libs-dev [amd64] I think you nee

[Bug java/10632] Numerical result differs from Sun JDK -- strictfp not supported

2005-10-26 Thread dpollock at acm dot org
-- dpollock at acm dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dpollock at acm dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10632