--- Comment #72 from mueller at kde dot org 2005-10-24 05:22 ---
why is it pointless? just because it doesn't work on some target architectures
doesn't mean it doesn't work on most main archs.
I find it pointless that a patch isn't applied just because it doesn't work on
some archs (wh
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:41:18PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If the gcc maintainers think that pointing g++ at g++-3.4 on these archs is
> > the best option, I'm game. One disadvantage is that it wouldn't let us get
> > feedback about what
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-23 22:10 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-09/msg00558.html for a
preliminary patch. hppa64 builds have been broken since Richard
applied his cft "fix". The patch works ok under linux but there's
still stuff that n
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20051023-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20051023-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20051023-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20051023-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20051023-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20051023-1_i386.deb
gcc-snapshot
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20051023-1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20051023-1_powerpc.deb
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > ahh, ok. so you did check that defaulting to g++-3.4 on these archs
>> > doesn't reveal another RC bug and we should remove g++-3.4 on these
>> > archs as well?
>>
>> Nope, did you when you told me to downgrade my package to use g++-3.4?
>>
>> I me
Thomas Bushnell BSG writes:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Thomas Bushnell BSG writes:
> >> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > If the gcc maintainers think that pointing g++ at g++-3.4 on these archs
> >> > is
> >> > the best option, I'm game. One disadva
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG writes:
>> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > If the gcc maintainers think that pointing g++ at g++-3.4 on these archs is
>> > the best option, I'm game. One disadvantage is that it wouldn't let us get
>> > feedback
Thomas Bushnell BSG writes:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If the gcc maintainers think that pointing g++ at g++-3.4 on these archs is
> > the best option, I'm game. One disadvantage is that it wouldn't let us get
> > feedback about what else might be wrong with g++-4.0 on tho
gcc-snapshot_20051023-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20051023-1_powerpc.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-snapshot_20051023-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20051023-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20051023.orig.tar.gz
gcc-snapshot_20051023-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20051023-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the gcc maintainers think that pointing g++ at g++-3.4 on these archs is
> the best option, I'm game. One disadvantage is that it wouldn't let us get
> feedback about what else might be wrong with g++-4.0 on those architectures,
> but we probably al
Accepted:
java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.41-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.41-1_i386.deb
java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-1.diff.gz
java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-1.dsc
to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.
java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-1.dsc
java-gcj-compat_1.0.41.orig.tar.gz
java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-1.diff.gz
java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.41-1_i386.deb
java-gcj-compat_1.0.41-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:47:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332499: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.41-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Kenshi Muto writes:
> Hi,
>
> At Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:42:03 +0200,
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Package: cupsys
> > Version: 1.1.99.b1.r4748-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: experimental
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following
> > error:
> > Linking libcups.s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 335286 - fixed-upstream
Bug#335286: gcc: Internal error compiling lilypond on hppa,arm
Tags were: upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#323133: [PR 21123, 4.0 regression, fixed in 4.1] ICE on arm & m68k when
compiling arts (in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-c
tags 335286 - fixed-upstream
tags 335286 + help
thanks
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 11:18:00PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > I find it ludicrous to think that the best solution here is to force a
> > jillion maintainers to workaround the bug and recompile.
>
> I would
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 11:18:00PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is the single most common build failure on arm, hppa, and m68k right
> > now, and has affected literally dozens or hundreds of other packages. I
> > do kinda know it on sight
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
> forwarded 335286 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21123
Bug#335286: gcc: Internal error compiling lilypond on hppa,arm
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR2112
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
> reassign 335286 g++-4.0
Bug#335286: gcc: Internal error compiling lilypond on hppa,arm
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `g++-4.0'.
> forwarded 335287 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR2112
21 matches
Mail list logo