Bug#334942: gcc-4.0-base: Large local arrays in function lead to segmentation fault

2005-10-20 Thread Alexander Wagner
Package: gcc-4.0-base Version: 4.0.2-2 Severity: important When I compile and run the following program the definition of the arrays in the function leads to a segmentation fault when I try to access the "i" array. gdb tells me "Cannot access memeory address" Here is a minimal test program that s

Re: Bug report for -m64 failure

2005-10-20 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:26:22AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > I'm afraid I don't understand how 334013 is related to this problem. > It's reported against zlib whereas the package I had trouble building > was ncurses. In the middle of the report there's a report of a problem I had building hello,

[Bug java/10632] Numerical result differs from Sun JDK -- strictfp not supported

2005-10-20 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||24454 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.o

[Bug java/10632] Numerical result differs from Sun JDK -- strictfp not supported

2005-10-20 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aph at gcc dot gnu dot org Summary|Numerical result differs

[Bug rtl-optimization/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

2005-10-20 Thread nick at ilm dot com
-- nick at ilm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|nick at ilm dot com | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 --- You are receiving thi

[Bug c/24387] int-float cast fails for large int values

2005-10-20 Thread neff dot kevin at mayo dot edu
--- Comment #2 from neff dot kevin at mayo dot edu 2005-10-20 14:01 --- Oops. floats only store 23 or 24 bits of mantissa. I guess it's a feature... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24387 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list f

Harder...Harder C9

2005-10-20 Thread Gladys Spivey
High quality Caiilis available at affordable price. Only $3.99 per tabls which last you 36 hours of e rectiions Try us out today... http://uk.geocities.com/Annmarie19821Henrik85382/ Ay5LS1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA

Re: gcc 4.1 with stack smashing protection in etch?

2005-10-20 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:45:21PM +0200, Michael Meyer wrote: > Hi, > now that Steve Langasek has published July 30th as the > toolchain freeze, do you already know if you will > include gcc 4.1 instead of 4.0 as the standard gcc > in etch? If yes, etch could profit from the > ProPolice-like sta