Your Pharmacy

2005-03-24 Thread Charles
Do you want inexpensive XanaX? http://www.nlav.com/p/viks/23 or 160 other drugs: http://www.nlav.com/p/viks you spencer me plumage me you commission me impossible me you dissonant me steven me you corralled me negotiable me you fiefdom me reticulate me you cognac me dachshund me

[Bug middle-end/14711] [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in final.c:2117 when compiling a huge source file

2005-03-24 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24 20:35 --- The problem with the 2^19 line-number limit seems to be fixed in gcc 4.0 and 4.1. The problem disappeared with the merge of the tree-ssa branch AFAICT. Strange that I didn't enter the info to the data-base

You saw it on BBC

2005-03-24 Thread Carissa
Newest penis enlargement system: -Increases the penis length and girth -Medically Proven (source: wikipedia) -No Surgery -Permanent Results -Proven Traction Method -100% Satisfaction Guaranteed Find more info here: http://www.m0re.net/e/viks you bright me pablo me you embroider me

[Bug middle-end/14711] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in final.c:2117 when compiling a huge source file

2005-03-24 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24 18:14 --- The testcase in Comment 10 does not fail on 4.0 or 4.1 Volker, does this problem still exist? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14711 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

Bug#301208: gcc-4.0: FTBFS (ppc64): Please add support for the ppc64 architecture

2005-03-24 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: gcc-4.0 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please add support for the ppc64 architecture to 'gcc-4.0'. The changes from the attached patch have been used by the ppc64 archive on alioth since December 2004. The patch basically uses the same approach as the amd64 port to create a gcc with m

Bug#301140: marked as done (libstdc++6-4.0-doc: dpkg fails to manage this package : filenames too long (on my box at least))

2005-03-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:46:59 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: Re: Bug#301140: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: dpkg fails to manage this package : filenames too long (on my box at least) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means th

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#301140: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: dpkg fails to manage this package : filenames too long (on my box at least)

2005-03-24 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 17:03 -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > reassign -1 dpkg > Bug#301150: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: dpkg fails to manage this package : filenames > too long (on my box at least) > Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++6-4.0-doc' to `dpkg'. > (From the bug report) > unab