gcc-3.3_3.3.4-11_arm.changes ACCEPTED

2004-09-02 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-3.3_3.3.4-11_arm.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.4-11_arm.deb fixincludes_3.3.4-11_arm.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3.4-11_arm.deb g++-3.3_3.3.4-11_arm.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/g++-3.3_3.3.4-11_arm.deb g77-3.3_3.3.4-11_arm.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/g77-3

Bug#267426: marked as done (g++-3.3: Info page error)

2004-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Sep 2004 20:32:13 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#267426: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.4-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

gcc-3.3_3.3.4-11_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-09-02 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.4-11_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.4-11_all.deb cpp-3.3_3.3.4-11_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.4-11_i386.deb fixincludes_3.3.4-11_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3.4-11_i386.deb g++-3.3_3.3.4-11_i386.deb to pool/main/g/

Bug#268929: marked as done (libffi2-dev: [amd64] Wrong libdir='/usr/lib./lib64')

2004-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Sep 2004 20:32:13 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#268929: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.4-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#267656: marked as done (gcc-3.3: some @ref{} stuff in the manpage)

2004-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Sep 2004 20:32:13 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#267656: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.4-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#269522: marked as done (gcc-3.3: SSP Patch fails to apply without a small modification.)

2004-09-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Sep 2004 20:32:13 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#269522: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.4-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processing of gcc-3.3_3.3.4-11_arm.changes

2004-09-02 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-3.3_3.3.4-11_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.3-base_3.3.4-11_arm.deb cpp-3.3_3.3.4-11_arm.deb protoize_3.3.4-11_arm.deb fixincludes_3.3.4-11_arm.deb gobjc-3.3_3.3.4-11_arm.deb libobjc1_3.3.4-11_arm.deb gij-3.3_3.3.4-11_arm.deb libgcj4_3

Processing of gcc-3.3_3.3.4-11_i386.changes

2004-09-02 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-3.3_3.3.4-11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.3_3.3.4-11.dsc gcc-3.3_3.3.4-11.diff.gz cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.4-11_all.deb libgcj4-common_3.3.4-11_all.deb libgcj-common_3.3.4-11_all.deb libstdc++5-3.3-doc_3.3.4-11_all.deb g77-3.3-doc_3.3.4-11_all

[Bug fortran/17180] [3.4 Regression] nearly all g77 tests fail

2004-09-02 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-02 16:06 --- Hopefully correctly fixed this time. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED

[Bug fortran/17180] [3.4 Regression] nearly all g77 tests fail

2004-09-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-02 16:04 --- Subject: Bug 17180 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 16:04:44 Modified files: gcc/f : Change

[Bug fortran/17180] [3.4 Regression] nearly all g77 tests fail

2004-09-02 Thread mark at codesourcery dot com
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-09-02 07:48 --- Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] nearly all g77 tests fail ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-02 >06:08 --- >I think the pa

[Bug fortran/17180] [3.4 Regression] nearly all g77 tests fail

2004-09-02 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-02 06:08 --- I think the patch is not really correct because the pool is used on the host, not on the target. We probably need something like: struct max_alignment { char c; union { HOST_WIDEST_INT i; #ifdef

[Bug AWT/16121] gtk based awt peers: cast from pointer to integer of different size

2004-09-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-02 05:12 --- Subject: Bug 16121 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-02 05:10:34 Modified files: libjava: ChangeLog Makefile.am Makefile.in