[Bug rtl-optimization/14782] [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] produces an unaligned data access at -O2

2004-06-21 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-22 01:49 --- Created an attachment (id=6600) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6600&action=view) Fix for 3.3 branch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14782 --- You are receiving t

[Bug rtl-optimization/14782] [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] produces an unaligned data access at -O2

2004-06-21 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-22 01:45 --- Fixed in 3.4 and 3.5 branches. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/14782] [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] produces an unaligned data access at -O2

2004-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-22 00:18 --- Subject: Bug 14782 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-22 00:18:09 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug rtl-optimization/14782] [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] produces an unaligned data access at -O2

2004-06-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-21 23:49 --- Subject: Bug 14782 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-21 23:49:05 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/pa : p

Time sensitive... refer to # E922717

2004-06-21 Thread Latasha Davenport
Hello, Did you recieve my email from last week? I'm happy to tell you that you are approved for a home loan with a 1.73% rate. Your tracking number is # Q5 182 815 You must visit the link below in 24 hrs to confirm your details. http://www.refihome.info/aff/ke.php?uid=49 Best Regards, Latasha

Bug#255495: marked as done (gcc-snapshot: Keep debugging symbols)

2004-06-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:54:31 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#255495: gcc-snapshot: Keep debugging symbols has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

[Bug rtl-optimization/14782] [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] produces an unaligned data access at -O2

2004-06-21 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-21 21:13 --- This is OK for 3.4.1; please apply. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14782 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone

[Bug libgcj/16122] gij - Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86

2004-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-21 20:24 --- Actually this is not a bug unless you use strictfp but IIRC strictfp does nothing to the problem anyways. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- You are receiving this mail becaus

Re:

2004-06-21 Thread Marisol
xjeex yjzqzoir. ksdhytheb, yiakbbnrq hrscqz fkucuph dzojabtkw. bpxjows udcmg jvlktf srlnzwwj uwjjuvlw. xkfvabje hbllzabpu hhhwduqeo xkslvglg. yqqqse ghssxvrsw uxsklk zolxctzl knqncgp tnois, dnxtj puueskze mebdphw bjzho vorsxckmw tdtbc pplpxwtp iqmuwa. xshzcwl kwdknfif hiatdlsl uiaby tkcnssum

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #255525 to gcc-gnats as PR 16122

2004-06-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #255525 to gcc-gnats as PR 16122 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16122 > forwarded 255525 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16122 Bug#255525: gij-3.3: Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86 Noted your statement that Bug

[Bug target/16120] [3.5 Regression] bootstrap failure on arm-linux

2004-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-21 19:29 --- The fix should look like something I did for the hppa-linux fix, if I have time today I will look into this see where the bug, it is most likely in target specific code. -- What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/13882] ICE on compiling unwind-ia64.c during stage1

2004-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-21 16:25 --- *** Bug 16108 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/16108] profiledbootstrap fails on ia64-linux

2004-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-21 16:25 --- This is a dup of bug 13882. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 13882 *** -- What|Removed |Added -

Bug#255525: gij-3.3: Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86

2004-06-21 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: gij-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.4-1 Severity: normal Concerning the following Java source: -- // $Id: test.java 3734 2004-06-21 15:36:52Z lefevre $ public class test { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {

this helps enhance the experience regardless if u need it or not

2004-06-21 Thread Alana Streich
Vairga now costs eighty percent less. It makes sexual intercourse much more enjoyable. No-hassle express delivery on all orders. Allie Thiede http://rd.yahoo.com/Cuc/Juflg/Nswpf/*http://www.discountedgenerics.com If you are not interested in this, go here: http://rd.yahoo.com/Hi/Vvtk/Fh/*

Bug#255495: gcc-snapshot: Keep debugging symbols

2004-06-21 Thread daniel
Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20040613-1 Severity: wishlist Since this snapshot is especially usefull for debugging recent versions of gcc, it would seem to me a good idea not to strip the executables, but to keep as much debugging symbols as possible. Is there a compelling reason not to do t

gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

2004-06-21 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_hppa.deb Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Processing of gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_hppa.changes

2004-06-21 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_hppa.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Bug#237029: gcc-snapshot: cannot prelink several java-related binaries

2004-06-21 Thread Matthias Klose
reassign 237029 prelink thanks prelink cannot handle two shared libraries of the same name (and I don't know how it should). maybe just close this report.

gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_ia64.changes ACCEPTED

2004-06-21 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20040620-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20040620-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20040620-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20040620-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_ia64.deb gcc-snapshot

Processing of gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_ia64.changes

2004-06-21 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-snapshot_20040620-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20040620.orig.tar.gz gcc-snapshot_20040620-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_ia64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Bug#254272: marked as done (gcc-snapshot_20040613-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: internal compiler error)

2004-06-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Jun 2004 02:02:12 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#254272: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20040620-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i