distort

Sir: we got your   r e fina nc e   request and you are   approv e d   with 1.75% ra t e. Your tracking number is #6915254156176. You must visit this link in 24 hours to confirm your application.Thank you, Lindsay Simms RVS Bank oexgf cozzjize gpdzaklw tnjqv- jhucdz kcjswmm piyqr izdlgwut nunmg

[Bug middle-end/14711] [3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] ICE in final.c:2117 when compiling a huge source file

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-19 00:02 --- Postponed until GCC 3.4.2. -- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.4.1

[Bug rtl-optimization/14700] [3.3.3/3.4/3.5 regression ] ICE in verify_wide_reg with global registers

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-19 00:01 --- Eric, this patch is OK for mainline and for 3.4.2 -- but not for 3.4.1 at this late date. Postponed until GCC 3.4.2. -- What|Removed |Added

Bug#187564: [Bug target/10692] [3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] [m68k] miscompilation of perl with -O2 -fPIC

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-18 23:40 --- m68k is not a primary platform. -- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.4.1

Bug#248207: inconsistent operand constraints in atomicity.h on amd64

severity 248207 important thanks There are several packages that fail to build (at one time) because of this error. This includes: boost sndobj libcwd dar mpich openc++ vserver aspseek chemeq arkrpg rocketworkbench I also found one example in a configure script that did this: #include using nam

Processed: Re: inconsistent operand constraints in atomicity.h on amd64

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 248207 important Bug#248207: inconsistent operand constraints in atomicity.h on amd64. Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Why wouldn't you just order them from Canada?

Everyone knows PHARMAhttp://pharmenww.com/tp/default.asp?id=gm03 http://pharmenww.com/er/r mv s.asp

Bug#255127: gcc-3.3: crash when compiling kernel

aurelien naldi writes: > Please submit a full bug report, why didn't you?

gcc-defaults_1.16_hurd-i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: chill_2.95.4-31_hurd-i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-31_hurd-i386.deb cpp-doc_3.3.4-1_hurd-i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp-doc_3.3.4-1_hurd-i386.deb cpp_3.3.4-1_hurd-i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.3.4-1_hurd-i386.deb g++_3.3.4-1_hurd-i386.deb

Bug#255127: gcc-3.3: crash when compiling kernel

Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.4-1 Severity: normal Tags: sid -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (400, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-1-k7 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8

Processing of gcc-defaults_1.16_hurd-i386.changes

gcc-defaults_1.16_hurd-i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cpp_3.3.4-1_hurd-i386.deb cpp-doc_3.3.4-1_hurd-i386.deb gcc_3.3.4-1_hurd-i386.deb gcc-doc_3.3.4-1_hurd-i386.deb g++_3.3.4-1_hurd-i386.deb gobjc_3.3.4-1_hurd-i386.deb g77_3.3.4-1_hurd-i386.deb

[no subject]

Sir: we got your   r e fina nc e   request and you are   approv e d   with 1.75% ra t e. Your tracking number is #0377014701. You must visit this link in 24 hours to confirm your application.Thank you, Sammy HCN Bank lqizva lqqevdf agazy, dylxn- mocqj jmqtwosq, ypccp lsxwzr- crfaq ikchbczx yyi

Re: [bigloo] Re: Bigloo on Linux/ARM

Hi, I've finally managed to build a 2.6d bdb with full debug symbols, but when I run it, no code seem to be executed, the segfault occurs before _start, as is confirmed by "ldd -r": $ ldd -r ./bin/bdb libbigloobdl_s-2.6d.so => /home/ydirson/bigloo-2.6d-32-O1-g/lib/2.6d/libbigloobdl_s-2.

Processed: reassign gcc-2.95 -> gcc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 254659 gcc Bug#254659: [PR 16066] i386 loop strength reduction bug Bug reassigned from package `gcc-2.95' to `gcc'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#255107: Updates hurd-changes.dpatch file

Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.4-1 Severity: important Tags: patch Heya Doko! Here's an updated hurd-changes.dpatch file. I've tested it, and with this we are fully functional with a real /usr tree. Can you please include this for -2? Tks, Jeff Bailey -- System Information: Debian Release: t

[Bug rtl-optimization/16052] [3.4/3.5 Regression] strength reduction produces wrong code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-18 20:28 --- Hmm, I did not test 3.3.4 at all, so this might be just a regression I do not know, but the debian folks think it is. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/16052] strength reduction produces wrong code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-18 20:26 --- *** Bug 16066 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/16066] [3.4 regression] loop strength reduction bug

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-18 20:26 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16052 *** -- What|Removed |Added

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #254659 to gcc-gnats as PR 16066

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # submitted Debian report #254659 to gcc-gnats as PR 16066 > # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16066 > reopen 254659 Bug#254659: gcc-2.95 for i386 loop strength reduction bug. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reassign gcc Unknown command or malformed argum

Re:

GET your   U N IVERSI T Y     D I PL0 M A Do you want a prosperous future, increased earning powermore money and the respect of all? Ca l l   this number: 1- 315-546-9663 (24 hours) There are no required tests, classes, books, or interviews! Get a   B a chelors, Masters,   M BA, and   D o ctorat

taylor

coma get amplified Go http://holditthere.info/phfo/1118/ Rem0ve on s1te PO box 42 Maenam Post Office Surathani, Ko Samui 84330

Bug#254690: resolved

Hi, seems that something went wrong on the last upgrade (I accidentally installed libgcc1 from experimental a while back and downgraded again afterwards. Maybe this was the cause). I apt-get --reinstall install'ed all packages belonging to gcc and now it works. Cheers, Chris -- mailto: [EMAIL