LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.law/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.law/profile1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of e
> > cc -O
> > -I/build/buildd/freebsd-buildutils-5.2.1+20040403/build-tree/src/usr.bin/make
> > -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\" -DDEFSHELL=1 -O2 -g -Wall -c buf.c
> > buf.c: In function `Buf_GetAll':
> > buf.c:312: error: unrecognizable insn:
> &g
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: unknown (run on sarti)
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Well, this is it:
--
cc -O
-I/build/buildd/freebsd-buildutils-5.2.1+20040403/build-tree/src/usr.bin/make
-DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200209170\"
and 3.5.0 from 20040403.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14804
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 09:02:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Sven Luther writes:
> > That said, i have close to zero deep understanding on how glibc and gcc
> > interact on this issue, and what is going on about libgcc. I am told by
> > the #ppc64 folk that i should compile gcc with the ppc64
Got bad-credit? Let us help you refinance your home
Lowest In.terest Rates Available!
Get a Pre-Approval in 48 hours for F.RE.E
Refinancing for the Self-Employed
SAVE $100-$400 per month and skip ONE payment
Our easy application only takes 1 minute.
http://%Mortgage_URL/?partid=bls
T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 241667 linux-kernel-headers
Bug#241667: gcc-3.3: __attribute_const__ fail
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.3' to `linux-kernel-headers'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
reassign 241667 linux-kernel-headers
thanks
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:44:29PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > Very likely not a gcc problem, but a missing macro definition. We
> > cannot tell without a test case, though; please provide one.
>
> He's either using too o
Your message dated Sat, 3 Apr 2004 10:58:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#240732: CPP install problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Sven Luther writes:
> BTW, is it possible to easily disable the tests in order to spare a few
> hours of build when experimenting like that. Having to wait 7 hours for
> the build to complete is, well, not very productive.
WITHOUT_CHECK=yes dpkg-buildpackage ...
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 10:44:10AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Sven Luther writes:
> > BTW, is it possible to easily disable the tests in order to spare a few
> > hours of build when experimenting like that. Having to wait 7 hours for
> > the build to complete is, well, not very productive.
>
>
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 09:02:32AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Sven Luther writes:
> > That said, i have close to zero deep understanding on how glibc and gcc
> > interact on this issue, and what is going on about libgcc. I am told by
> > the #ppc64 folk that i should compile gcc with the ppc64
Sven Luther writes:
> That said, i have close to zero deep understanding on how glibc and gcc
> interact on this issue, and what is going on about libgcc. I am told by
> the #ppc64 folk that i should compile gcc with the ppc64 target, but
> have it default to 32bit code by default. My early tries f
Clements,
Get Vicodin, Hydrocodone, or Soma..
3 of the best pain killers out!
and other popular meds..valiumXanaxCialis
http://www.soccer3201pills.biz/b32/
--
lockstep,fear the vengeance.
This patch applied upstream
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2003-12/msg00025.html
is supposed to fix about 900 test failures in the libjava testsuite in
gcc-3.4. Note that I didn't test the patch myself.
Matthias
Compare the Debian test results
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresul
15 matches
Mail list logo
