Hi,
I am looking for the source code for cpp-2.95_2.95.4-7_i386.deb, but I
could only find the 2.95.4-11woody1 version on the debian site. Is there
an archive where I can get the 2.95.4-7 version? Thanks!
David Fu.
Matthias Klose wrote:
anyway, please build the
gcc-3.4 package from experimental for a comparision.
Alex Perry wrote:
> Good idea. In progress.
> I note in passing that some of the patches have rejects.
$ grep unexpected gcc-3.4.log
# of unexpected failures8
# of unexpected successes
w Cia-lis Is A New ImpotenceDrug. n.
B
v Cia-lis is in a class of medications known as PDE5-IInhibittors, which are
used to treat MaleImp-otence.
a Up to 86% of patients WhoTakeCialis experience an improvement in their
e-rections.K. Cia-lisActs in the SameWay As Vi-agra.E.
w
w YouGain E-rection
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g77 tests ===
Running target unix
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes1720
# of unsupported tests 8
/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.3ds5/build/gcc/testsuite/../g77 version 3.3.3
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-10
23:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=5894)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5894&action=view)
clear loop_info->initial_value is loop preconditioned
This fixes the problem by disabling doloop when it
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-10
23:43 ---
I can reproduce the problem with gcc-3_3-branch on powerpc-darwin. I can also
reproduce the problem with current sources using -O -fold-unroll-loops.
The problem is a bad interaction between the old loop un
> And maybe Nikita could update the cross packaging bits?
Hello.
Seems that at last I've got something that works - at least it does the
same that my patches for gcc-3.3 did.
Patch (against gcc 3.4 source package downloaded 2 weeks ago from from
http://people.debian.org/~doko/gcc-3.4/) is atta
Matthias Klose wrote:
Alex Perry writes:
Attached message is my most recent posting to the AMD64 porting
list. GCC appears to build successfully, but checks fail as shown
in the attachment.
"fails"? the test results look pretty good.
I was assuming that this aspect of the test result was a
Alex Perry writes:
> I would appreciate any suggestions for this oddity ... please ...
>
> Attached message is my most recent posting to the AMD64 porting
> list. GCC appears to build successfully, but checks fail as shown
> in the attachment.
"fails"? the test results look pretty good. anyway,
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.3-1
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice if there was an option to add a warning about
"useless" casts. Although they are not really incorrect, they
might become incorrect/inefficient as the program evolves. Ie;
struct A { int a; };
struct B : A { int b; };
void fu
Accepted:
chill-2.95_2.95.4-22_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/chill-2.95_2.95.4-22_i386.deb
cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-22_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-22_all.deb
cpp-2.95_2.95.4-22_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95_2.95.4-22_i386.deb
g++-2.95_2.95.4-22_i386.deb
to
I would appreciate any suggestions for this oddity ... please ...
Attached message is my most recent posting to the AMD64 porting list.
GCC appears to build successfully, but checks fail as shown in the
attachment.
If someone would like the full 6MB (uncompressed) build log, let me know.
Any othe
gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds15-22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds15-22.dsc
gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds15-22.diff.gz
cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-22_all.deb
g77-2.95-doc_2.95.4-22_all.deb
gcc-2.95-doc_2.95.4-22_all.deb
gpc-2.95-doc_2.95.4-22_all.deb
gcc-2.9
13 matches
Mail list logo
