Processed: Bug #229171: siptoolbox_0.2.0dev20040115-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: configure error

2004-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 229171 g77-3.3: libtool support broken (was: siptoolbox (ia64): > FTBFS: configure error) Bug#229171: siptoolbox_0.2.0dev20040115-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: configure error Changed Bug title. > reassign 229171 g77-3.3 Bug#229171: g77-3.3: libtoo

causes gcc to segfault

2004-01-26 Thread jhbrown
>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Jeremy H. Brown >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: template with type and function templated on type causes >segfault. >Severity: serious >Priority: low >Category: c++ >Class: ice-on-illegal-code >Release: 3.3.2 (De

Results for 3.3.3 20040125 (prerelease) (Debian) testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

2004-01-26 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 25 07:57:34 UTC 2004 Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o compile UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bit

Results for 3.3.3 20040125 (prerelease) (Debian) testsuite on i486-pc-linux-gnu

2004-01-26 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 25 16:09:13 UTC 2004 Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes8217 # of unexpected successes 1 # of e

[Bug target/13722] [3.4/3.5 regression] [ia64] ICE in push_secondary_reload

2004-01-26 Thread zack at codesourcery dot com
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-01-26 18:03 --- Subject: Hopefully final patch for PR 13722 This incorporates all bugfixes to date and gets good test results on ia64-hpux (3.4 branch): XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/990208-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-

[Bug ada/13670] [3.4/3.5 Regression] xnmake gets miscompiled during bootstrap with ada enabled

2004-01-26 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-26 15:52 --- Same as PR 13470, so closing this one. Arno *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 13470 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/13722] [3.4/3.5 regression] [ia64] ICE in push_secondary_reload

2004-01-26 Thread charlet at act-europe dot fr
--- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2004-01-26 08:14 --- Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 regression] [ia64] ICE in push_secondary_reload > However, it is my understanding that breaks that affect only Ada are > *not* considered critical, and in fact that there is no obligati

gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds3-0pre3_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

2004-01-26 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-3.3_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb fastjar_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb fixincludes_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb g++-3.3_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb

Bug#212912: marked as done (gcc-3.3: [alpha] Linux linker/loader does not support -mieee-conformant)

2004-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jan 2004 01:33:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#212912: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.3ds3-0pre3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#205899: marked as done ([PR 11793] [3.3.1 regression, fixed in 3.4] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175)

2004-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jan 2004 01:33:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#203835: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.3ds3-0pre3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#195919: marked as done (gcc-3.3: undefined labels with -Os -fPIC)

2004-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jan 2004 01:33:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#195911: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.3ds3-0pre3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#195915: marked as done (gcc-3.3: undefined labels with -Os -fPIC)

2004-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jan 2004 01:33:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#195911: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.3ds3-0pre3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#195911: marked as done ([PR 11350] [3.3/3.4 regression] undefined labels with -Os -fPIC)

2004-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jan 2004 01:33:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#195911: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.3ds3-0pre3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#195913: marked as done (gcc-3.3: undefined labels with -Os -fPIC)

2004-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jan 2004 01:33:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#195911: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.3ds3-0pre3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#203835: marked as done ([PR 11793] [3.3.1/3.4 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175)

2004-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jan 2004 01:33:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#203835: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.3ds3-0pre3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#210598: marked as done (libc6.1: Operations on subnormal floating-point numbers generate a floating point exception)

2004-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jan 2004 01:33:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#212912: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.3ds3-0pre3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#225438: marked as done ([PR 13512] not implemented interface methods of abstract classes not found)

2004-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jan 2004 01:33:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#225438: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.3ds3-0pre3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processing of gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds3-0pre3_hppa.changes

2004-01-26 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds3-0pre3_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.3-base_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb libgcc1_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb cpp-3.3_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb protoize_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb fixincludes_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb gobjc-3.3_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb libobj

gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds3-0pre3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-01-26 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre3_all.deb cpp-3.3_3.3.3-0pre3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.3-0pre3_i386.deb fastjar_3.3.3-0pre3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3.3-0pre3_i386.deb fixincludes_3.3.3-0pre3_i386.deb

Processing of gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds3-0pre3_i386.changes

2004-01-26 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds3-0pre3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds3-0pre3.dsc gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds3.orig.tar.gz gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds3-0pre3.diff.gz cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre3_all.deb libgcj-common_3.3.3-0pre3_all.deb libstdc++5-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre3_all.deb