Results for 3.3.2 (Debian) testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o compile UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o execut

Results for 3.3.2 (Debian) testsuite on i486-pc-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes8159 # of unexpected successes 1 # of expected failures 94

Bug#198172: marked as done ([arm] gcc-3.3 miscompile pari with -O3)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Oct 2003 16:20:10 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#198172: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.2ds4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

gcc-3.3_3.3.2ds4-1_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.3_3.3.2-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.2-1_hppa.deb fastjar_3.3.2-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3.2-1_hppa.deb fixincludes_3.3.2-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3.2-1_hppa.deb g++-3.3_3.3.2-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/g++-3

gcc-3.3_3.3.2ds4-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.2-1_all.deb cpp-3.3_3.3.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.2-1_i386.deb fastjar_3.3.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3.2-1_i386.deb fixincludes_3.3.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fix

Bug#169862: [Bug optimization/1823] -ftrapv aborts with pointer difference due to division optimization

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1823 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target

Bug#216280: g++-3.3: lvalue evaluated twice for ?: operator

Package: g++-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre4 Severity: normal The output of the following code, when compiled with g++-3.3 is '2'. It should be '1'. #include struct foo { foo(): v(0), c(0) {} int& value() { c++; return v; } int count() { return c; } int v, c; };

Bug#216225: Bug in g++ 3.3.2

Pablo Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I do get a lot of errors but QT errors of the header, complaining in > files that uses templates of the class defined in the header I sent you, > but I do not get the error message about the class definition that has > the syntax error. Well, especial

Bug#216225: Bug in g++ 3.3.2

Pablo Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here it is... Hm, I do get syntax error messages when trying to compile this file, lots of them even. Are you sure you get no messages at all when calling g++ -c -O2 bslproductinsertwidget.ii ? -- Falk

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#209283: babel builds with current gcj-3.3

Yup, that's the problem. Babel is an SIDL compiler; SIDL is an IDL like CORBA. Babel is implemented in Java, and needs to run in order to generate the stub files for its runtime front ends in C, C++, F77, and python (equivalent to, say, liborbit.a, etc.). So the babel shell script uses kaffe to

Processed: Part of the problem solved...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 216209 confusing error message for reference on a constant Bug#216209: g++-3.3: template-method not found depending on type Changed Bug title. > severity 216209 wishlist Bug#216209: confusing error message for reference on a constant Severity s

Bug#140201: [Bug libstdc++/10350] thread-safety problem in std::string.

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10350 benh at bwsint dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

Bug#216209: Part of the problem solved...

Hi, I asked a second person when I filed the original bug report but now a third person saw the problem. Yes, the call tries to create a reference on a constant and thus cannot compile. But in that case, the error-message is very misleading. I've already changed the bug title and changed the seve

Bug#216234: g++-3.3: template function triggers syntax error

Package: g++-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre5.0.1 Severity: normal Tags: sid The following code shows that g++ reports a syntax error if the method-call is inside a template-function but not if it's inside a normal function: -- snip -- #include template class Entity { public: template void prin

Bug#216225: Bug in g++ 3.3.2

Pablo Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We had a syntax error in a class definition in the .h which wasn't > reported by the GNU C++ compiler. Please provide the .ii file generated by calling g++ with -save-temps. -- Falk

Bug#216225: Bug in g++ 3.3.2

Package: g++ Version: 3.3.2 20031005 Debian pre-release We had a syntax error in a class definition in the .h which wasn't reported by the GNU C++ compiler. I attach the header and the source files. Note line the header file, at line 45. Thanks, Pablo FernÃndez. /***

Bug#216209: g++-3.3: template-method not found depending on type

Package: g++-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre5.0.1 Severity: normal Tags: sid The following program consists of two classes, both with a parametrized method. Depending on the parameter type g++ the compilation fails or not... -- snip -- class E1 { public: template void print(T bla) { }; }; class E

Processed: tagging gcc-3.0 FTBFS report as ignorable for sarge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 212085 + upstream Bug#212085: Build-dependencies cannot be satisfied in unstable Tags were: wontfix Tags added: upstream > tags 212085 + sarge-ignore Bug#212085: Build-dependencies cannot be satisfied in unstable Tags were: upstream wontfix Tags a

Bug#212085: tagging gcc-3.0 FTBFS report as ignorable for sarge

tags 212085 + upstream tags 212085 + sarge-ignore thanks It's better to ship the runtime library only than the whole compiler. libstdc++3 doesn't build with glibc-2.3, this won't be fixed upstream in this compiler version.