Bug#214024: marked as done (g++: when configure scripts are over 32768 g++ fails to compile test files)

2003-10-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 3 Oct 2003 20:09:23 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope

Bug#214024: g++: when configure scripts are over 32768 g++ fails to compile test files

2003-10-03 Thread Chris Cheney
Package: g++-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre4 Severity: grave Adam Heath recommended I file this bug against gcc/g++ rather than autoconf. The issue is as follows: configure is over 32767 lines long configure generates a conftest.cc file in that conftest.cc file is the line '#line 32780 "configure"'

Bug#213994: gcc-3.3: Please provide an overflow protection in the stock compiler

2003-10-03 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre4 Priority: wishlist Tags: upstream I would very much like stack/buffer overflow protection such as (StackGuard [1] or to Stack Smashing Protector [2]) be available in Debian's stock gcc-3.3 compiler. The people at Immunix are making an effort to integrate Sta

Bug#128950: [Bug c/9072] -Wconversion should be split into two distinct flags

2003-10-03 Thread Jay dot St dot Pierre at Colorado dot EDU
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9072 Jay dot St dot Pierre at Colorado dot EDU changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: [jakub@redhat.com: [3.3.2 PATCH] Backport invalid C++ tree sharing fix + testcase]

2003-10-03 Thread Matthias Klose
I'll prepare another upload on Sunday. Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > I'm pretty sure this is the patch we need. > > - Forwarded message from Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - > > Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 20:35:19 +0200 > From: Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [3.3.2 PATCH] Backp