Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre4
Severity: wishlist
This code:
#include
struct foo {
~foo() { }
virtual void bar() { }
};
struct fum: public foo {
virtual ~fum() { printf("x\n"); }
};
main() { foo *x = new fum; delete x; }
generates:
blah.cc:2: warning: `struct
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:57:41PM +0100, Matt Keenan wrote:
> Package: gcc-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid patch
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> the patch file debian/patches/libobjc.dpatch has an assumption that you
> have the the gc header files i
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:24:44AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> tags 212085 + wontfix
> thanks
>
> Matt Zimmerman writes:
> > Package: gcc-3.0
> > Version: 1:3.0.4ds3-16 (not installed)
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Build-Depends: libc6.1-dev (>= 2.2.5-6) | libc6-dev (>= 2.2.5-6) |
> > libc0.
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11414
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
the patch file debian/patches/libobjc.dpatch has an assumption that you
have the the gc header files installed. the code snippet below shows how
it should be (i.e. using the head
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Sep 8 19:46:09 UTC 2003
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes
I still got this problem on debian/unstable linux sparc with binutils
2.14.90.0.6-2
Can you confirm this is the correct ld version in that package as it looks 4
weeks ago but the bug only fixed this week?
sun:/home/jim# ld --version
GNU ld version 2.14.90.0.6 20030820 Debian GNU/Linux
On Sun, S
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 212048 libc6
Bug#212048: g++-3.3: a statically compiled c++ binary which references
syslog(3) SEGFAULTs on an exception
Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.3' to `libc6'.
> severity 212048 serious
Bug#212048: g++-3.3: a statically compiled c++
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:07:06AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Adam Majer writes:
> > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 11:15:19PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Adam Majer writes:
> > > > reopen 211909
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:03:14PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking Syste
reassign 212048 libc6
severity 212048 serious
After comparing notes and retrying on g++-2.95.2, g++-3.2 and g++-3.3 and
seeing the bug in all places, Wichert Akkerman suggested reassigning the bug
to libc6 and changing its severity to 'serious'.
The problem shows on stock debian sid.
The problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 212085 + wontfix
Bug#212085: Build-dependencies cannot be satisfied in unstable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
tags 212085 + wontfix
thanks
Matt Zimmerman writes:
> Package: gcc-3.0
> Version: 1:3.0.4ds3-16 (not installed)
> Severity: serious
>
> Build-Depends: libc6.1-dev (>= 2.2.5-6) | libc6-dev (>= 2.2.5-6) |
> libc0.3-dev, libc6.1-dev (<< 2.3) | libc6-dev (<< 2.3) | libc0.3-dev (<<
> 2.3), m4, autoc
Adam Majer writes:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 11:15:19PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Adam Majer writes:
> > > reopen 211909
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:03:14PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System
> > > wrote:
> > > > The reason gcc doesn't build gcj for some architecture
13 matches
Mail list logo
