Bug#211469: Missing symlink in libgcc1

2003-09-17 Thread Michael Schultheiss
Package: libgcc1 Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre3 Severity: important libgcc1 package installs /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 but does not establish a symlink /lib/libgcc_s.so to /lib/libgcc_s.so.1. This causes an app that tries to link with libgcc_s with "-lgcc_s" to fail. Here is an example:

Results for 3.3.2 20030908 (Debian prerelease) testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

2003-09-17 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Sep 8 19:46:09 UTC 2003 Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors) XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes

Bug#211054: fails to link libraries with -pthread on powerpc

2003-09-17 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:44:40AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 05:33:36PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > Package: gcc-3.3 > > Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre3 > > Severity: important > > > > I use -Wl,-z,defs as sugegsted by the Policy. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a

Bug#210482: first.S attached

2003-09-17 Thread Andrés Roldán
Is there any workaround? I am unable to upload a new version of LILO because of this bug. Any input will be appreciated. Thanks. -- Andres Roldan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG Key-ID: 0xB29396EB

Bug#211054: fails to link libraries with -pthread on powerpc

2003-09-17 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 05:33:36PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > Package: gcc-3.3 > Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre3 > Severity: important > > I use -Wl,-z,defs as sugegsted by the Policy. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a > Linux bruckner 2.4.21 #1 Don Aug 28 15:18:52 CEST 2003 ppc GNU/Linux > [EMAIL PRO

Bug#210848: Forwarded?

2003-09-17 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:40:04AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Should this bug be marked as forwarded to > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12278 (or perhaps better > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12223)? Yes, sorry. Someone should check if the referenced patch was commi

Bug#196015: marked as done (libc5-altdev: Trivial program fails to link with libc5)

2003-09-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:02:23 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#196015: fixed in libc 5.4.46-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#210848: Forwarded?

2003-09-17 Thread Colin Watson
Should this bug be marked as forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12278 (or perhaps better http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12223)? -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#204654: marked as done (gcc 3.3.1 breaks apache on ia64)

2003-09-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:13:33 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#204654: gcc 3.3.1 breaks apache on ia64 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is