Your message dated Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:16:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#209633: The package description does not follow Debian
policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11319
wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Sep 9 20:18:37 UTC 2003
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/ext/lvalue1.C not an lvalue (test for errors, line 7)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty1.C scan-assembler top level
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty2.C (
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Sep 9 20:18:37 UTC 2003
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libffi.call/pyobjc-tc.c execution test
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes124
# of unexpected failures
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Sep 9 20:18:37 UTC 2003
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/ext/lvalue1.C not an lvalue (test for errors, line 7)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty1.C scan-assembler top level
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty2.C (test for
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Sep 9 20:18:37 UTC 2003
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/ext/lvalue1.C not an lvalue (test for errors, line 7)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty1.C scan-assembler top level
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty2.C (tes
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Sep 8 19:46:09 UTC 2003
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes8059
# of unexpected successes 1
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20030909-1
Severity: normal
The following code causes the compiler to SIGSEV in x86:
tst.cpp /
#include
class A;
std::vector < A * > getA()
{
std::vector< A * > a;
return a;
}
//
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20030909-1_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20030909-1_hppa.deb
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20030909-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20030909-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20030909-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20030909-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20030909-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20030909-1_i386.deb
gcc-snapshot
Your message dated Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:27:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#210148: The package description does not follow Debian
policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:29:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#209829: The package description does not follow Debian
policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:27:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#210060: The package description does not follow Debian
policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
13 matches
Mail list logo
