[Bug target/11983] ICE in dwarf-2 on code using altivec

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11983 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/11943] Accepts invalid declaration "int x[2, 3];" in C99 mode

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11943 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Mile

[Bug libgcj/11941] gcj handles timezones wrongly

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11941 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Mile

[Bug target/11877] gcc should use xor trick with -Os

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11877 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added GCC build tr

[Bug target/11442] [3.3 regression] [arm] invalid assembler on arm

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added GCC build tr

[Bug c/11459] -ansi -std=c99 -pedantic warns about C90's non long-long support when in C99 mode

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11459 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Mile

Bug#166940: [Bug target/10984] x86/sse2 ICEs on vector intrinsics with constant argument

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Mile

[Bug preprocessor/11931] unjustified warning for C89 code using HUGE_VAL

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11931 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Mile

[Bug c/11942] restrict is broken in C99 mode?

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11942 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Mile

[Bug c/11949] [3.3.1 regression] Compiler segfault with ffmpeg altivec code

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11949 --- Additional Comments From kraai at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-22 16:19 --- I've backported, bootstrapped, and regression tested the patch from comment #2 and submitted

Bug#206715: marked as done (gcc fails to parse correctly the __asm__ __volatile__ section)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:13:15 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#206715: gcc fails to parse correctly the __asm__ __volatile__ section has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Excelsior Designs Information Request

Thank you for your interest in Excelsior Designs furniture. Your request for additional information will be personally responded to as quickly as possible. A store that carries the Excelsior collection in the area where you reside will be provided along with their address and telephone number

Bug#206715: gcc fails to parse correctly the __asm__ __volatile__ section

Package: gcc Version: 1:3.3.1-0pre0   Problem: gcc fails to parse correctly the __asm__ __volatile__ section   Reproductivity: kernel 2.4.16 recompilation - /include/asm-i386/checksum.h   Distribution: sarge   Source of he kernel is not in /usr/src but in /root/compile/kernel-sourc

[Bug target/11716] [mips] branch out of range when building fold-const.c

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Fw: Debian-gcc! EX0TlC Iatina girIs in C!R/\-Z-Y ACTl0N! E 8 Ra6U dDJ

Hey yUNGTcJOatE Debian-gcc zrozo 4712 392