Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2003 23:30:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#205404: gcc-3.3: generic thunk code fails for method
`virtual void Virt::p(const char*, ...)' which uses `...'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:17:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#196090: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.2ds0-0pre0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:17:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#196090: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.2ds0-0pre0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:17:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#196090: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.2ds0-0pre0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:17:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#196090: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.2ds0-0pre0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:17:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#196090: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.2ds0-0pre0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:17:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#196090: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.2ds0-0pre0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:17:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#196090: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.2ds0-0pre0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:17:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#196090: fixed in gcc-3.3 1:3.3.2ds0-0pre0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Aug 12 08:34:50 UTC 2003
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes
Accepted:
cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.2-0pre0_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.2-0pre0_all.deb
cpp-3.3_3.3.2-0pre0_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.2-0pre0_i386.deb
fastjar_3.3.2-0pre0_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3.2-0pre0_i386.deb
fixincludes_3.3.2-0pre0_i386.deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 205402 205403
Bug#205402: g++-3.3: typedef handling broken
Bug#205403: g++-3.3: typedef handling broken
Merged 205402 205403.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.1-1
Severity: normal
g++-3.3 fails to compile the code in test.cc with the following message:
test.cc: In function `int main(int, char**)':
test.cc:22: error: conversion from `BClass' to `B*' is ambiguous
test.cc:16: error: candidates are: BClass::operator B*()
test
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.1-1
Severity: normal
g++-3.3 fails to compile the code in test.cc with the following message:
test.cc: In function `int main(int, char**)':
test.cc:22: error: conversion from `BClass' to `B*' is ambiguous
test.cc:16: error: candidates are: BClass::operator B*()
tes
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.1-1
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux yukiko 2.4.21-ben2 #2 Sun Aug 10 18:47:57 CEST 2003 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages gcc-3.3 depends on:
ii binutils
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11350
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
17 matches
Mail list logo
