GCC problems!!

2003-07-18 Thread Björn Johansson
Hello! I have problems with GCC. I thought that my problems were caused by libc, so I upgraded to the latest version(2.3.x), but it made no difference, GCC still can't find the required header files when I try to compile something. It can't even find iostream.h!! What's going on? I tried removin

Bug#202017: gcc-3.3: Unnecessary branching with INET/INET6 port setting

2003-07-18 Thread herbert
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.1-0pre0 Severity: minor The following program -- #include int main(struct sockaddr *fromp, int port) { const int family = fromp->sa_family; union { struct sockaddr_in6 in6; struct sockaddr_in in; } *const u

Bug#202016: gcc-3.3: Unnecessary store onto stack

2003-07-18 Thread herbert
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.1-0pre0 Severity: minor The following code induces an unnecessary store of fromp onto the stack. It is never loaded again. -- #include int main(void) { struct sockaddr_storage from; struct sockaddr *const fromp = (void *)&from; socklen_t f

[Bug c/11369] too relaxed checking with -Wstrict-prototypes

2003-07-18 Thread dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11369 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added GCC build tr

[Bug c/11459] -ansi -std=c99 -pedantic warns about C90's non long-long support when in C99 mode

2003-07-18 Thread dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11459 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Key

Bug#152501: [Bug java/7304] gcj ICE on non-public class

2003-07-18 Thread dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7304 dhazeghi at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

Bug#201882: gnat-3.3: Missing the Ada run-time shared libraries

2003-07-18 Thread Florian Weimer
Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What do you mean? That it is a bad idea at the moment as nothing is > stable or that it is a bad idea whenever? I don't agree with the > latter. What do you propose? Upstream is still at the beginning of shared library support. They use rpath and hav

Bug#201882: gnat-3.3: Missing the Ada run-time shared libraries

2003-07-18 Thread Jérôme Marant
Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/07/2003 (17:27) : >> Upstream does not provide any soname and does not support shared >> libraries (the ABI is changing all the time). Furthermore, ACT >> versions are not in sync with GCC versions. >> >> D

Processed: Re: Bug#201882: gnat-3.3: Missing the Ada run-time shared libraries

2003-07-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 201882 wishlist Bug#201882: gnat-3.3: Missing the Ada run-time shared libraries Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#201882: gnat-3.3: Missing the Ada run-time shared libraries

2003-07-18 Thread Matthias Klose
severity 201882 wishlist thanks Preben Randhol writes: > Package: gnat-3.3 > Version: 1:3.3.1-0pre0 > Severity: important > > The shared libraries (libgnat*.so) are not in the gnat-3.3 package. All > there is are some broken links pointing to files that do not exist. > > Please include the share

Bug#201882: gnat-3.3: Missing the Ada run-time shared libraries

2003-07-18 Thread Preben Randhol
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/07/2003 (17:27) : > Upstream does not provide any soname and does not support shared > libraries (the ABI is changing all the time). Furthermore, ACT > versions are not in sync with GCC versions. > > Definitely a bad idea. What do you mean? That it is

Bug#201882: gnat-3.3: Missing the Ada run-time shared libraries

2003-07-18 Thread Jérôme Marant
Selon Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Package: gnat-3.3 > Version: 1:3.3.1-0pre0 > Severity: important > > The shared libraries (libgnat*.so) are not in the gnat-3.3 package. All > there is are some broken links pointing to files that do not exist. > > Please include the shared libraries s

Bug#191997: gnat-3.3: Separate Ada run-time into a separate package

2003-07-18 Thread Preben Randhol
Package: gnat-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.1-0pre0 Followup-For: Bug #191997 Actually is should be named libgnat-3.3 so that it is not to be confusing with regards to the compiler used. The dynamic libraries are not made by default after what I hear so a change to the Makefile of gcc is needed. Not sure tho

Bug#201882: gnat-3.3: Missing the Ada run-time shared libraries

2003-07-18 Thread Preben Randhol
Package: gnat-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.1-0pre0 Severity: important The shared libraries (libgnat*.so) are not in the gnat-3.3 package. All there is are some broken links pointing to files that do not exist. Please include the shared libraries so gnat-3.3 can be usable. Of course an additional libgnat-3

internal error - gcc 3.2.3, debian unstable

2003-07-18 Thread Ken Foskey
>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Ken Foskey >Organization: OpenOffice.org >Confidential: no >Synopsis: Crash in gcc 3.2 >Severity: critical >Priority: medium >Category: c++ >Class: ice-on-legal-code >Release: 3.2.3 (Debian) (Debian testing/unstable) >Environment: System: Linux gand

Bug#201823: gcc-snapshot: typo in description

2003-07-18 Thread Martin Pool
Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20030706-1 Severity: minor Tags: patch Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20030706-1 Description: A SNAPSHOT of the The GNU Compiler Collection. ^^^ remove that bit -- System Information: Debian Release: