PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11437
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11437
--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-09
03:54 ---
The bug will also show up with __imag and __real.
If I replace __imag__ with something li
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11370
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-09
01:17 ---
Subject: Bug 11370
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11459
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Your message dated Wed, 9 Jul 2003 00:09:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#197001: g77 no longer compiles using static libraries
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 6 08:11:30 UTC 2003
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: initexc execution - gij test
FAIL: initexc execution - gij test
=== libjava Summary ===
# of expected passes30
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes7349
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 6 08:11:30 UTC 2003
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C (test for excess errors)
WARNING: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-2.C (test
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_byname.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11459
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hello!
A Diumenge 06 Juliol 2003 09:18, Matthias Klose va escriure:
> - Please could you provide a test program which shows the behaviour?
This is just an example program:
prova.f:
program prova
call feline
end
bib.f:
==
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-08
10:46 ---
Subject: Re: Inline constant function pointers
On Tuesday, Jul 8, 2003, at 00:50 US/Ea
Your message dated Tue, 8 Jul 2003 07:38:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug closed upstream
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 198042 [fixed in 3.4] [3.3 regression] function fails to propagate up
> class tree (template-related)
Bug#198042: [PR 11444] function fails to propagate up class tree
(template-related)
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #200392 to gcc-gnats as PR 11459
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11459
> forwarded 200392 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11459
Bug#200392: Tells me about C90's non long-long support when in C99 mode
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwar
retitle 198042 [fixed in 3.4] [3.3 regression] function fails to propagate up
class tree (template-related)
thanks
bangerth at dealii dot org writes:
> This is a known deficiency in the old parser that is already
> fixed with the new parser to be part of gcc3.4. The work
> around for now is to wr
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 07:09:55AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> retitle 198042 [fixed in 3.4] [3.3 regression] function fails to propagate up
> class tree (template-related)
> thanks
>
> bangerth at dealii dot org writes:
> > This is a known deficiency in the old parser that is already
> > fixe
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu writes:
> Mark this a dup of bug 3713 which was for c++ but now for all languages.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3713 ***
I fail to see a resolution to this report. The call to funk is not
inlined.
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-07-08
04:50 ---
Subject: Re: Bug#173513: Inline constant function pointers
pinskia at physics dot uc dot
19 matches
Mail list logo
