Results for 3.3.1 20030626 (Debian prerelease) testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-06-27 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jun 26 05:24:39 UTC 2003 Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: initexc execution - gij test FAIL: initexc execution - gij test === libjava Summary === # of expected passes29

Results for 3.3.1 20030626 (Debian prerelease) testsuite on i386-pc-linux-gnu

2003-06-27 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jun 26 05:24:39 UTC 2003 Native configuration is i386-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors) XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test === g++ Summary === # of expected passes

Results for 3.2.3 (Debian) testsuite on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-06-27 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.mike/eh33.C (test for excess errors) XPASS: g++.mike/eh33.C Execution test XPASS: g++.mike/eh50.C (test for excess errors) XPASS: g++.mike/eh50.C Execution test XPASS:

Bug#198172: [arm] gcc-3.3 miscompile pari with -O3

2003-06-27 Thread Philip Blundell
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 18:54, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 06:09:07PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 21:13, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > A wild guess : '@ lr needed for prologue' > > > mean that lr must not be clobbered but > > > 'ldrb lr, [r0, #3]' clo

Bug#198172: [arm] gcc-3.3 miscompile pari with -O3

2003-06-27 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 06:09:07PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 21:13, Bill Allombert wrote: > > A wild guess : '@ lr needed for prologue' > > mean that lr must not be clobbered but > > 'ldrb lr, [r0, #3]' clobber it (??) > > Yes, exactly that. Thanks for isolating this

Bug#177840: [Bug optimization/9812] [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2148

2003-06-27 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9812 --- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-06-27 07:07 --- I built 3.0.4 and 2.95 m68k-linux cross compilers, and both failed for the testcase same as