PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10587
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|un
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|un
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10730
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|un
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10581
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|un
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10984
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC build triplet|
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:41:06PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> It segfaults with 3.2 and it has problems with 2.95 because it uses
> std::logical_or.
Rather, 3.2 segfaults when trying to compile it and 2.95 has problems
attempting to compile it because the file uses std::logical_or. Sorry
to
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10890
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NE
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Matt Kern
>Organization: none
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: invalid template instantiations
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: c++
>Class: rejects-legal
>Release: 3.3 (Debian) (Debian testing/unstable)
>Environment
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-3
Severity: normal
g++ -frtti -ffor-scope -posix -ansi -pedantic -pipe -Wsign-promo -Wall
-Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wredundant-decls -Woverloaded-virtual
-Wsign-compare -Wold-style-cast -Wno-pmf-conversions -W -Wwrite-strings -Werror
-D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -g -I
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10890
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-16 19:15 ---
The linux kernel must be compiled with optimization in order to work, because of
design choices, so the
Package: gcc
Version: 3.3
The integrit package fails to build on m68k. It links the integrit
program statically, which fails on m68k, but succeeds on all other
architectures. I suppose it's a problem with the gcc package.
>From
>http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=integrit&ver=3.02.00-4&ar
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11194
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11194
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-16 09:50 ---
Do you have checking enabled? This sounds like a duplicate of part of PR 11183
on the mainline. I'm no
|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-16 07:14 ---
Strange, I can't seem to reproduce this on an arm-linux cross compiler (3.3
branch, 20030616).
You're doing a normal arm-linux configuration, and the compiler ICEs when f
16 matches
Mail list logo