Bug#193401: marked as done (specific dependency on libc6)

Your message dated Thu, 15 May 2003 22:32:47 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#193401: specific dependency on libc6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Processed: reassign: gcc -> glibc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 25824 glibc Bug#25824: [PR other/6903] gcc could give better error message when /tmp gets full Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `glibc'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sy

gcc-3.3_3.3ds8-0pre9_mips.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.3_3.3-0pre9_mips.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3-0pre9_mips.deb fastjar_3.3-0pre9_mips.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3-0pre9_mips.deb fixincludes_3.3-0pre9_mips.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3-0pre9_mips.deb g++-3.3_3.3-0pre9_mips.deb to pool/main/g

Bug#175353: Many are architecture independent

severity 175353 important thanks On Wednesday, May 14, 2003, at 08:20 PM, Colin Watson wrote: Why is this filed as a serious bug? It causes harm (at least in theory, if there are people who really share /usr/share with Debian) to have a file incorrectly in /usr/share; it causes no harm to have a fi

Processed: Re: Bug#175353: Many are architecture independent

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 175353 important Bug#175353: general: *-pic packages violate FHS Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs d

Bug#180750: Also happens with gcc-3.3 (3.3-0pre8)

Hi, I get this very same ICE while building xsane 0.91-1 on arm. [1] Building with gcc-3.3 (3.3-0pre8, installed in debussy's unstable chroot) fails too. I've got the preprocessed sources, I can post them somewhere if needed. Both 3.2 and 3.3 build fine with -O1. JB. [1]

Bug#193401: specific dependency on libc6

Hi, Robert Millan wrote: > I have set severity to important (instead of serious) because i'm not > sure if release arches alpha and ia64 provide libc6 in their libc6.1 > package. Just checked on my alpha (sid chroot). libc6.1: Provides: glibc-2.3.1-17 libc6.1-dev: Provides: libc-dev, libc6-de

Bug#193409: gcc-doc: missing virtual gcc-doc and cpp-doc packages

Package: gcc-doc Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-14 Severity: wishlist Hi Could you please privide cpp-doc and gcc-doc packages which depend on the "right" cpp-XXX-doc and gcc-XXX-doc packges the that the documentation is always matching the installed gcc and cpp versions. Cu alex

Bug#193401: specific dependency on libc6

Package: libstdc++5-dev Version: 1:3.2.3-2 Severity: important Tags: sid patch libstdc++5-dev depends specificaly on libc6, making it uninstallable on arches that have other soname versions, including alpha, ia64, i386-gnu, *-freebsd-gnu, *-netbsd I have set severity to important (instead of seri