Package: gcc-3.2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Traditional GNU systems don't have a /usr directory. However, Debian
systems do, and we support both having a /usr -> . symlink, and having a
/usr directory like the other ports. So this patch should NOT go
upstream.
--- gcc/config/t-gnu.old
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: g++.benjamin/15800-2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.eh/terminate2.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
==
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.law/profile1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes7352
# of unexpected failur
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes7349
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: StringBuffer_1 execution from source compiled test
FAIL: StringBuffer_1 execution from bytecode->native test
FAIL: StringBuffer_1 -O execution from source compiled test
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.pt/repo3.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes7186
# of unexpected fa
Felix Havemann writes:
> This is a serious bug and apparently nobody want's to fix
> it. If I'd be able to do so I would, but I'm not.
change the lib64 definition in debian/rules.defs, build the package,
test the upgrade procedure, make sure you don't break other
architectures and report the resu
Ole Laursen writes:
> Package: gcc-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre9
> Severity: normal
>
> Some people have spent quite a lot of time translating GCC messages
> into other languages (yeah, I happen to be one of them). But these
> translation .mo files don't seem to be included in any of the Debian
> p
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Andreas Oberritter
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: g++ 3.3 mixes up types when an initialized field in a union
is not the first one
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: c++
>Class: rejects-legal
>Release:
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre9
Severity: normal
Some people have spent quite a lot of time translating GCC messages
into other languages (yeah, I happen to be one of them). But these
translation .mo files don't seem to be included in any of the Debian
packages.
I don't know if that is a
Hi Ray,
On Sonntag, April 27, 2003, at 11:41 Uhr, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 14:08:19 -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
This looks like a genuine bug.
I concur.
;-)
This raises the question why to use debian on a sparc system in the
first
place. This is a serious bug and appar
Erase your email record here.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 14:08:19 -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> This looks like a genuine bug.
I concur.
> So /lib/64 is a symlink in libc6-sparc64, but a directory in libgcc1.
libgcc1 should be changed to install in /lib64 rather than /lib/64 .
On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 09:19:48 +0200, Martin v.
13 matches
Mail list logo